2+2 Table NOW!>!>!>!>!>!>!

Vote4Pedro · #1 07-22-2005, 10:26 PM

BobbysFriend pvt password two

pokerstudAA · #2 07-22-2005, 10:29 PM

Oh.....it is on now.

wpzone · #3 07-22-2005, 10:42 PM

serious or lagfest? i might be able to join later

Buck_65 · #4 07-22-2005, 10:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
serious or lagfest?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's basically the same thing for me. I'm in, and I'm doing both.

pokerstudAA · #5 07-22-2005, 10:48 PM

[ QUOTE ]
serious or lagfest?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why does everyone ask this?

Just play poker baby.....I am playing to get the chips....

wpzone · #6 07-22-2005, 10:51 PM

asking cause I enjoyed our game earlier where we were discussing our hands and what might have been a better play. Not just everyone bettin and raising for the hell of it... Thats why

moot · #7 07-22-2005, 10:49 PM

I don't see why people get so hung up on it having to be one or the other. Might as well just let people play how they want. I can't stand the whiners who say everyone is "cheating." Yeah, and Party is rigged.

Plus we all know the single most satisfying poker experience is sucking out with absoulute garbage against someone who's playing "serious." So let 'em play all serious. Boohoo.

KingOtter · #8 07-23-2005, 12:41 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see why people get so hung up on it having to be one or the other. Might as well just let people play how they want. I can't stand the whiners who say everyone is "cheating." Yeah, and Party is rigged.

Plus we all know the single most satisfying poker experience is sucking out with absoulute garbage against someone who's playing "serious." So let 'em play all serious. Boohoo.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because lagfests suck for people whose bankroll is tight.

KO

topspin · #9 07-23-2005, 01:01 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see why people get so hung up on it having to be one or the other.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because lagfests suck for people whose bankroll is tight.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've often thought that it would be fun to have a 2+2 table at some nano-limit so that more people (like me!) could participate. This would have the added benefit that many low limits are not raked (e.g. Paradise .05/.1; I'm sure there's some Stars equivalent too).

Personally since I mostly play 1/2, the swings at a 2+2 table do make a noticeable difference to my bankroll. I'm sure I can't be the only micro poster to feel that way.

Maybe I'll try to start a nano table sometime when I'm less sleepy and see how well that works out [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

MrWookie47 · #10 07-23-2005, 01:15 AM

If you're up for it, I'll do a nanos table at Stars.

Edit: Just let me pour myself another drink...