|
|
|
|
#1
11-10-2005, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poetic Justice
On a similar note, there is a guy in our regular game that's trying to introduce the concept of checking it down when 2 players are against a 3rd who's all-in. Some of the others kinda get it, but forget it; the others don't get it at all. The problem is that he only tries to educate others when he's one of the 2 up against the all-in. On the one hand, I'd like some of the players to pick up on this idea; on the other, part of what I like about our game is that, while it's fairly competitive, it's still low-key.
|
|
#2
11-10-2005, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poetic Justice
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is that he only tries to educate others when he's one of the 2 up against the all-in. [/ QUOTE ] Hey, if he wants to explain it them a before the tournament thats one thing, but it is inexcusbale to let him educate other players during play. And of course checking it down isn't allways the smartest play. Some where along the way the idea that one should not bluff at a dry side pot (although I have alrady demonstrated one exception to this) has been misunderstood by many to mean you should not bet at a side pot. If you think your hand is good you very often should bet either for value or to eliminate the draw.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
