Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:30 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 346
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

This is theology, not scrabble. If I want to have lots of "fun" in this life, believe me, I can find another religion to do it in rather then one that has a crucified God. Although JP II has certainly set new standards for Catholics:







Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-22-2005, 01:01 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

JPII faithfully fulfilled his role as "servant of the servants of God" by travelling to meet the faithful in the enviroment in which they live their daily lives. The same as Jesus did. He was a true apostle who took the lamp of faith to the world and its far corners. Whereas you and your confréres place it under a bushel basket and bemoan the loss of past liturgical traditions while missing the essence of the gospel.

I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.
- 1 Cor. 9:22
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-22-2005, 01:21 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 346
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

But most of the pictures of the silly shows were taken at the Vatican. This is unbecoming of a prelate on sacred ground. And incidentally, the job description of the Pope is to preserve the deposit of the Faith, not travel around inculturating himself.



You're quoting passages like Not Ready too.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-22-2005, 01:25 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

unbecoming != heresy.

You have yet to offer even a shred of proof that JPII was a heretic.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-22-2005, 01:46 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

[ QUOTE ]
You have yet to offer even a shred of proof that JPII was a heretic.

[/ QUOTE ]

Suspicion is good enough for Peter.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-22-2005, 02:03 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 346
Default Re: ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia

What heresy am I adhering to that makes me a Protestant? And I don't use scriptural passages to fitted to my own context to make my points.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-22-2005, 02:10 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 346
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

Where have I declared that John Paul II is a heretic? I already explained about that is will require another Pope and Council to make any official decision. I am just showing bits and pieces of evidence that will be taken into consideration regarding him. Besides, he does not have to be a heretic Pope to be a bad Pope.

I proved the CCC was heretical. And why won't I get a straight answer to this question:

Can we hope or not hope for the salvation of unbaptized infants? If we can hope for it, how can you reconcile this with the Dogma that without baptism no one can enter Heaven?
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-22-2005, 02:17 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 346
Default Re: de asini umbra disceptare

"I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some."
- 1 Cor. 9:22

I have to add this juicy tid bit. Is this quote from the same St. Paul who condemned St. Peter for eating with the Jews, not because there was anything inherently wrong with it, but because his action caused scandal amongst the faithful?

Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-22-2005, 02:21 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default condemnant quod non intellegunt

[ QUOTE ]
You're quoting passages like Not Ready too.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yea, its so inappropriate to bring the words of scripture into a debate on christianity among christians (as opposed to quoting it to non-believers).
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-22-2005, 02:29 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: condemnant quod non intellegunt

"Is this quote from the same St. Paul who condemned St. Peter for eating with the Jews, not because there was anything inherently wrong with it, but because his action caused scandal amongst the faithful?"

So now you not only are mocking the Vicar of Christ but also God's apostles. What a great example of the faith.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.