|
|
#1
07-23-2005, 07:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
These stats are taken from a recent set of 640 SNGs that covered one month.
These are my stats after 587 SNGs. ITM: 32.4% ROI: 5.5% 1st: 12.6% 2nd: 10.9% 3rd: 8.9% Profit: $6,995.00 Not bad. Then I played up to 640. ITM: 33.6% ROI: 12.1% 1st: 14.1% 2nd: 11.1% 3rd: 8.4% Profit: $16,600 Amazing what a difference only 40 or 50 SNGs can make eh? BTW, I would say with pretty high confidence that all of these SNGs were played at very close to the same level. I have played enough of them now so that I don't tilt and I don't play differently in different stretches. 
|
|
#3
07-23-2005, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
500 sit and gos is a huge joke. Ive dropped 10 ROI points in my last 100 $215s, and this is after 750 of them. Fortunately the drop was from 36 ROI to 26 ROI [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Amazing how you forget that it's possible to win sometimes after many bad days in a row.
|
|
#5
07-23-2005, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
Honestly, I have no idea. I would estimate around 3000. I have stats on about 1500.
|
|
#6
07-23-2005, 11:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
Very nice profit.
It just shows that you are a winning player. Add about 1500 more and then you may know a steady ROI% you're able to obtain.
|
|
#7
07-23-2005, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
I used to think that 500 sngs was a small sample size, but then i saw daliman naked. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
|
|
#8
07-23-2005, 11:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
[ QUOTE ]
Amazing how you forget that it's possible to win sometimes after many bad days in a row. [/ QUOTE ] Yes. And no matter how often it happens you still have thoughts like, "Was I just lucky the past two years?" [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#9
07-23-2005, 03:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
Yes I keep thniking that maybe I was lucky!!!!!!!!!!!! Except then everytime someone does something ridiculous against me I remember why I win. (and fortunately it happens every few minutes, but as soon as I bubble, I immediately start thinking that my 2500 sng winning streak was just good luck). I have huge psychological problems.
|
|
#10
07-23-2005, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: For all the people that think 500 is a significant sample size.
i'm going to have to ask that you cease & desist with the SST play. you have a little over a month to prepare -- nothing but HU play for you. my 50dullers is riding on it [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] (nice cashing)
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
