Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:54 PM
MagnoliasFM MagnoliasFM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 89
Default Interesting AK hand

#Game No : 2385479380
***** Hand History for Game 2385479380 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:14051506 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Monday, July 18, 18:12:42 EDT 2005
Table Table 11105 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 8: jopke ( $800 )
Seat 10: I_have_Aces_ ( $785 )
Seat 6: t4racer ( $800 )
Seat 9: Dfulvio ( $785 )
Seat 5: BillyBoy5885 ( $605 )
Seat 7: FatTony21 ( $800 )
Seat 1: surfdog2000 ( $785 )
Seat 2: vahalla22 ( $800 )
Seat 4: julyguy ( $785 )
Seat 3: pogogt ( $1055 )
Trny:14051506 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to jopke [ Kh As ]
pogogt folds.
>You have options at Table 12774 Table!.
julyguy raises [50].
BillyBoy5885 folds.
t4racer calls [50].
FatTony21 folds.
jopke is all-In [800]
Dfulvio folds.
I_have_Aces_ folds.
surfdog2000 folds.
vahalla22 is all-In [785]
julyguy folds.
>You have options at Table 12062 Table!.
>You have options at Table 12774 Table!.
t4racer is all-In [750]
** Dealing Flop ** [ 2c, 6c, 5d ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 2s ]
** Dealing River ** [ 7s ]
vahalla22 shows [ 6d, 7c ] two pairs, sevens and sixes.
t4racer shows [ Qs, Th ] a pair of twos.
jopke shows [ Kh, As ] a pair of twos.
vahalla22 wins 2460 chips from the main pot with two pairs, sevens and sixes.
t4racer finished in ninth place.
jopke finished in ninth place.
t4racer has left the table.
jopke has left the table.
Game #2385483094 starts.


*i edited my name to "jopke" because i don't want to reveal my identity
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:56 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

[ QUOTE ]

*i edited my name to "jopke" because i don't want to reveal my identity

[/ QUOTE ]

You probably should edit out the hand # then.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:57 PM
tshort tshort is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

Can't blame vahalla, he was connected.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:57 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Interesting AK hand


Ok another important note. Yes pushing may be okay preflop because look at what the idiots called you with. However for me, calling preflop and then playing well postflop may easily have a much higher EV than your play. I also don't expect them to be this stupid usually, this was a rare case.

Basically I don't move allin here. With 600 chips maybe, with 800 I just flat call. So often when I call I end up doubling up on good flops and losing the absolute minimum on bad flops. I wont flat call for a huge % of my stack, but 1/16th I can deal with.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:57 PM
liucipher liucipher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seat 6, $11s
Posts: 180
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

interesting because you're in a $33.

welcome to my world in the $6s.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:58 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Interesting AK hand


I just don't understand how the hand number is going to give away someones identity. Everyone always says this, but what do they think we are going to somehow find the hand number just to figure out who some poster is?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2005, 06:59 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

[ QUOTE ]

I just don't understand how the hand number is going to give away someones identity. Everyone always says this, but what do they think we are going to somehow find the hand number just to figure out who some poster is?

[/ QUOTE ]

Request hand history -> fill in hand number -> check replaced name.

Not that I care OP is playing under the nick A*********r. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-18-2005, 07:10 PM
MagnoliasFM MagnoliasFM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

Hi. I'm struggling with whether to play it my way or yours.

The benefits of going all-in:
- If you lose you don't lose the 30-40 mins and you can join another tournament right away.
- While usually people aren't dumb enough to call with 67 and QT, they ARE dumb enough to call with AQ, AJ, Ax suited a lot higher percentage of times, which usually puts me in a favorable position to double up.
- If I'm up against Ax and slowplay, I can only get all his money if one of the 2 remaining aces flop. If I get him all-in preflop I give myself the best chance of doubling up.
- I could get myself into trouble by slowplaying if I'm up against Ax and the x flops along with the A.

I think I just go all-in a lot early on (even with AA and KK) because people call preflop more often than they hit top pair. This seems really dumb and goes against everything they teach you in the books but it's what's been working for me. Maybe I'll try not going all-in and making standard raises with my big hands for a little, and see what it does.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-18-2005, 07:34 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

[ QUOTE ]

- If you lose you don't lose the 30-40 mins and you can join another tournament right away.

[/ QUOTE ]

If that ever is a factor in how you play your hands, then it is a gigantic leak.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-18-2005, 07:55 PM
liucipher liucipher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seat 6, $11s
Posts: 180
Default Re: Interesting AK hand

I totally agree it's not a good way to think about individual hands. OP should be processing all the information he possibly can and not worrying about whether it's early in a tournament or late in one.

I think there's a certain amount of validity to it though when you're considering overall strategy. There's a huge difference between return on investment and return on time invested. Arguably, the latter is more important. Otherwise, why multitable? By definition, you must be making less than optimal decisions by playing so many tables at the same time.

If OP is willing to take on variance because doubling up early does him much better than timid shortstack play, it may very well be higher EV.

My $.02. I single-table $6s and take notes on every freaking hand, so what do I know about profitability.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.