|
|
|
|
#1
09-24-2005, 09:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
The river call makes me think AA [/ QUOTE ] Really? Cuz that makes me think he had a flush draw and a pair somewhere and it didnt come in, doesn't really fit though. Trips for you makes some sense on the early streets, but River doesn't make much sense, meh. I'll go with 22, KJ, AA or QQ, those seem solid possibilities. For the record I don't like BB's lack of a Pre-flop 3-bet or his call of your 3-bet on the Flop. For shame. 
|
|
#2
09-24-2005, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
For the record I don't like BB's lack of a Pre-flop 3-bet or his call of your 3-bet on the Flop. For shame. [/ QUOTE ] If I'm capable of a continuation bet / bluff 3-bet on the flop, are you capping?
|
|
#3
09-24-2005, 10:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fundamental Theorem / Hand reading from 2+2 Table
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For the record I don't like BB's lack of a Pre-flop 3-bet or his call of your 3-bet on the Flop. For shame. [/ QUOTE ] If I'm capable of a continuation bet / bluff 3-bet on the flop, are you capping? [/ QUOTE ] Well, it all ties in with Pre-flop. I three bet a 2+2er here most of the time. That flop is pretty bad for me, If I am behind I am drawing to 2 outs, putting any extra money in when we are this behind is really costly. It's apparent that to get this hand to Showdown I'm going to have to call 2 more BBs, and to win if I'm ahead I have to dodge a million Overcards. I'll fold to your 3-bet.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
