Wilson software

[Aaron W.]

So apparently, the 3rd street advice is a little too loose. Is it grossly too loose, or just moderately (on certain types of hands)?

What about the advice on later streets.

I used Wilson's Turbo Texas Hold'em software when I was starting up there, and while the advice was generally too passive, it really helped solidfy some basics (starting hand and flop evaluation). Would I expect similar results from the stud-8 software (decent advice up to 5th street, and then the quality tails off on the last couple streets)?

[DocOfDan]

Hi Andy

if the example I gave is any way representative (the demo only allows you to play 50 hands - same ones every time) then I think it is grossly too loose. I would welcome the experience of anyone who has used the full version though

[dandy_don]

[ QUOTE ]
I used Wilson's Turbo Texas Hold'em software when I was starting up there

[/ QUOTE ]

Welcome to Stud, "down here".

[stickman]

It is not grossly too loose, but there are hands that you know are just unplayable that the advisor indicates as playable.
To answer a previous question, it is loose on all streets. However, the hand and table position simulators are well worth it.

[Aaron W.]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I used Wilson's Turbo Texas Hold'em software when I was starting up there

[/ QUOTE ]

Welcome to Stud, "down here".

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. Ambiguous phrasing. "To start up" - an idiomatic(?) verb.