#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The flip side of dominating the bubble
yeah.. if its slightly ChipEV to call.. the shorter stacks definitely fold... where would i estimate the cut-off to be?
I guess maybe 60% is good enough to call... definately not 51% and intuitively 55% seems too close as well.ll although the *correct* figure is prolly closer to 55 then 60% in a normal tourny. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The flip side of dominating the bubble
I really like this post, unfortunately I just walked in the door from the Taj and am fried. I will try to post my thoughts tomorrow
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The flip side of dominating the bubble
Against the tight guy it's probably something rediculous like AA-QQ and against the loose guy it's probably AA-TT,AK. It's amazing how tight calling ranges when covered become around the bubble because the value of just making back twice your buyin becomes pretty significant. It's really counter intuitive because you know that bigger stacks should be raising a really wide range.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The flip side of dominating the bubble
bump
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The flip side of dominating the bubble
I was reading through some of my saved posts and found this one. I'd love to hear some input from others.
|
|
|