Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-04-2005, 12:49 AM
WLVRYN WLVRYN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 141
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

I saw a thread earlier that put it around 3,700 currently if I remember correctly. Here's the link:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...14&fpart=1
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-04-2005, 12:52 AM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

[ QUOTE ]
But David Williams over Raymer? If your concern is a track record, that one doesn't make much sense to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hasn't Williams made more TV final tables?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-04-2005, 12:58 AM
JohnnyHumongous JohnnyHumongous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 382
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure I'd want Raymer on my 100 list before Tuan Le.

[/ QUOTE ]

Raymer was a pretty close alternate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sklansky is dead weight on your list in comparison with Raymer (no offense David). Sklansky doesn't play the megalo- stack-building style that one will need to make a final table of 10 people out of 6500. Even money, I would take Sklansky to finish higher than Raymer. But all else being equal I would take Raymer to catch the final table over Sklansky.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-04-2005, 01:17 AM
paperboyNC paperboyNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 290
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

[ QUOTE ]
So if that's not wrong then the chances of there not being a single name from my list at the final table would come to [(6500/6800)(6499/6799)(6498/6798)(6497/6797)(6496/6796)(6495/6795)(6494/6794)(6493/6793)(6492/6792)], or [66.6%].

Am I wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

I did the calculations myself and get the same result. Of course I don't know if your method of adding 300 to the total players is correct. But either way it doesn't make a huge difference in the calculation. Just a couple percentage points.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-04-2005, 01:54 AM
housenuts housenuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 357
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

i would wager one of those fellows will make the final table. look at the final tables of the recent events, there's like 4 or 5 of those guys at each of them. granted the fields are smaller, but still i'm quite confident one of them will make it.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-04-2005, 06:49 AM
orensi orensi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

My money is on the list.
If -none- of the Big Guns make it to the final table then the ME is too large.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-05-2005, 04:54 AM
TiltsMcFabulous TiltsMcFabulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

It would absolutely astonish me of none of those pros made the final table.

~ Tilts
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:50 AM
Ond Ond is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

[ QUOTE ]
My money is on the list.
If -none- of the Big Guns make it to the final table then the ME is too large.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree.

Maybe they should raise the entry fee to 25k next year?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.