Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2005, 03:39 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Basic Stud 8 Question.

In general, when you raise with a big split pair on 3rd street in Stud 8 and get reraised by a player whom you have no read on with an ace up, is this always an immediate fold? I can't really think of why you should call, but folding every single time seems horribly weak, and something that could easily be exploited by aggressive opponents.

I guess you could probably make an adjustment if someone was doing this consistently, but what adjustment do you think could be made? Reraise on 3rd, or just call the other guy down if he catches high cards?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2005, 03:47 PM
greenage greenage is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

I think Alchemist said he folds almost all of his split pairs (except Aces) and I'm startling to have an appreciation for this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2005, 04:04 PM
mscags mscags is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Between Two Hot Twins
Posts: 713
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

ALmost all split pairs should be folded anyway because you can get yourself into a lot of trouble with these hands. In general the only time that you should be raising with a big split pair is when you think you can steal the antes or get it heads up with someone (hopefully a high)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2005, 08:41 PM
benwood benwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 90
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

One option is to limp with the split pair & see what the A does.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2005, 12:41 AM
Andy B Andy B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

Yeah, this is a fold, but observant opponents will run you over if they see you do this a time or two. Really, if you have a split pair and there's an Ace behind you, you don't cost yourself much by mucking right away. Not that I do this, of course.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:28 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

i wouldn't even attempt to raise a split big pair if an ace is showing. its just going to cause you too much heartache.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-28-2005, 10:54 AM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 672
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

Why are you raising a big split pair into the ace of a player you don't know? Don't do this. Once you know them, and the table, it may or may not be ok, but if it is ok it is usually only marginally so. Big pairs are big traps in stud 8, and you would not be giving up too much if you always mucked them. If you play them, you especially don't want to play against an ace, and you don't want to play against more than two opponents going low (really one, but two is marginal, three is just awful IMO).

Here's a secret, sometimes, even if you know there is a high probability that your opponent is being over aggressive, the correct play is still to fold. This comes up all the time in all games, and is one of the reasons aggresiveness and isolation plays are so powerful.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:25 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Basic Stud 8 Question.

[ QUOTE ]
I think Alchemist said he folds almost all of his split pairs (except Aces) and I'm startling to have an appreciation for this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.