Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2005, 07:59 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default ($27) ITM SB play

I got a "?" typed in the chat for this one. Thoughts?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t800 (3 handed) pokerhand.org hand converter

Button (t1893)
Hero (t6677)
BB (t4930)

Preflop: Hero is SB with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Button raises to t1843</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t6627</font>,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:00 AM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

Yeah, it's 7AM, why are you playing poker?

I'd prolly call too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:10 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it's 7AM, why are you playing poker?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it's 8AM, why are you reading 2+2?

[ QUOTE ]
I'd prolly call too.

[/ QUOTE ]

This opponent was on the tight side, but I thought with the dead money from the BB this was clear. *shrug*
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:13 AM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it's 7AM, why are you playing poker?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it's 8AM, why are you reading 2+2?

[ QUOTE ]
I'd prolly call too.

[/ QUOTE ]

This opponent was on the tight side, but I thought with the dead money from the BB this was clear. *shrug*

[/ QUOTE ]

Two sick kids, and sick mom, means I get to go to bed here soon.

Yeah, and getting something like 2.2:1 to call here makes this pretty f.ing easy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:13 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

Yeah, it seems fine. I did something similar yesterday, Button in that case had KQ, BB called with AK.

Pity I had AA and them both covered.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

All I know is, my gut says "maybe".

I think it's pretty close between isolating and calling hoping to check it down *against some opponents*. Maybe I will do some math later, this is actually a pretty interesting question to me. So long as it's close, I'd prefer calling and checking it down for image purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:15 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it seems fine. I did something similar yesterday, Button in that case had KQ, BB called with AK.

Pity I had AA and them both covered.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hehehe.

Well, it's +0.5% if he's only pushing top 25%... and I really don't see him folding QTs here...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:16 AM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

[ QUOTE ]
All I know is, my gut says "maybe".

I think it's pretty close between isolating and calling hoping to check it down. Maybe I will do some math later, this is actually a pretty interesting question to me. So long as it's close, I'd prefer calling and checking it down for image purposes.

[/ QUOTE ]

This pot is going to be huge. I don't want the BB to have a shot at it, it's not enough of an $EV improvement to call and check it down. If Button had like, exactly 800 chips I would do that maybe.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:40 AM
ChrisW ChrisW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

If the BB is obsessed with eliminating the short stack (only coming over the top of your call with a monster, and checking it down unless he hits the flop hard), my math makes it look like a small mistake to move in.

On the other hand, if the BB will bet all sorts of mediocre hands on the flop, that not only decreases your chance of winning but also increases the short stack's chance to double up. In that case, you have to get him out of the way by moving in.

If you don't know about the BB's tendencies, it's no big deal whether you call or push.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2005, 08:46 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ($27) ITM SB play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All I know is, my gut says "maybe".

I think it's pretty close between isolating and calling hoping to check it down. Maybe I will do some math later, this is actually a pretty interesting question to me. So long as it's close, I'd prefer calling and checking it down for image purposes.

[/ QUOTE ]

This pot is going to be huge. I don't want the BB to have a shot at it, it's not enough of an $EV improvement to call and check it down. If Button had like, exactly 800 chips I would do that maybe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Correct me if I'm wrong here--and I've been up more than 24 hours so it's entirely possible I'm missing something trivial--but the only time you would rather isolate than check down is when the results are that BB beats Hero beats Button. Of course you would very much rather isolate then (while the other five possible results are relatively* close but favor checking down) but that's also the results where isolating is the least likely to work.

I'm pretty sure this depends quite a bit on how BB is going to act (I edited in "*against certain opponents*" to my previous post right before you finished replying).

*Actually BB beats Button beats Hero might not be that close
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.