|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
[ QUOTE ]
Mike and VVP are cool. They're cool because they are themselves and because they each actually have a unique style - from what they say to what they wear. Lon and Norman are losers. They are homogenized. They wear things like black jeans with mock turtlenecks and sportcoats - WTF? Plus VVP gets laid a lot and Sexton is a good player. This really isn't close. [/ QUOTE ] Not that it matters to me how broadcasters dress, but it's funny how Chad busts on just about every player's wardrobe, considering the lame getup that he wears. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
Bingo, bango, bongo! I enjoy the WPT broadcasts a whole lot, but it is a little creepy to know that Mike and Vince can't see the hole cards while the action is happening. Speaking of "results-oriented," this presumably means that their commentary is informed (and possibly distorted) by complete knowledge of everything that's going to happen.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
I hate the way Mike Sexton just assumes whatever he does is always right (as in, raising every A high hu) and then criticizes players for not doing it.
And he's incredibly results oriented. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
[ QUOTE ]
And he's incredibly results oriented. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
I only hate Mike when he questions a good poker play. Either he's playing dumb for the audience or he just isn't very good. I hate VVP with a passion because he knows absolutely nothing. If he calls 44 a monster or a "real hand" ever again I will have him killed.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sexton\'s WPT Commentary
Guy pushes with something like an open ended straight draw.
Mike: "and that's a semi bluff at best!" Yes, because some of the time even if he gets called and hits his draw, he might get hit by a meteor and lose the pot. Only in a BEST CASE SCENARIO does it qualify as a semi bluff. |
|
|