Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2005, 03:43 AM
BZ_Zorro BZ_Zorro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: $100 NL
Posts: 612
Default Implied value and draws

Does implied value make it ok to call a pot sized bet on a draw?

Just had a conversation with a marine who said it was...he ended up threatening to "talk to his IT buddies" and get me drafted. Neither or us is giving a quarter, so we're gonna let the experts decide. He wanted to bet me $100 that your opinion would be in favor of him, but said to forget it later on.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) converter

UTG+1 ($109.6)
UTG+2 ($221.97)
MP1 ($68.5)
Hero ($87.5)
MP3 ($176.02)
CO ($98.5)
Button ($145.3)
SB ($177.8)
BB ($83.1)
UTG ($103.75)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.5.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $1, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls $1, MP3 calls $1, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB (poster) completes, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $3</font>, UTG+1 calls $3, Hero calls $3, MP3 calls $3, SB folds.

Flop: ($17) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $15</font>, MP3 folds, BB folds, UTG+1 calls $15.

Turn: ($47) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, Hero goes all in, UTG+1 calls $68.50.

River: ($115.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Final Pot: $115.50

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
UTG+1 has 9s Ts (straight, ten high).
Hero has 6h 6d (full house, sixes full of sevens).
Outcome: Hero wins $115.50. </font>

Two questions:
Is calling a pot sized bet with his hand a good play?
If he somehow expected me to go all in on the turn, was it a good play?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2005, 03:49 AM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: Implied value and draws

It depends. The stacks need to be deep enough for your call to be correct. You need to have a decent draw. Position is nice. He was double gutted so that probably qualifies as a decent draw. His draw is pretty concealed also so it'd probably get paid off. He got it in with the best of it.

I'm not math savvy enough to add it all up. Someone else probably can.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2005, 03:55 AM
Dignan Dignan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8
Default Re: Implied value and draws

1. No
2. No
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-08-2005, 03:58 AM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: Implied value and draws

[ QUOTE ]
1. No
2. No

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm fairly certain you're wrong. Maybe not in this exact situation, but calling pot bets with OESDs or double gutters with deep stacks isn't wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2005, 03:59 AM
mscags mscags is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Between Two Hot Twins
Posts: 713
Default Re: Implied value and draws

When you add in his implied odds he was getting something around 100:15 which is more like 6:1 which is more than enough for a double gut shot or open ended straight draw. However even though it worked out in the end, I think it is an incorrect call unless he is positive that he can get the rest of your money.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2005, 04:01 AM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: Implied value and draws

When you say "it worked out in the end" I assume you mean he got it all in when he still had best hand?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-08-2005, 07:16 AM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: Implied value and draws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
1. No
2. No

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm fairly certain you're wrong. Maybe not in this exact situation, but calling pot bets with OESDs or double gutters with deep stacks isn't wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are 5:1 to hit your OESD. You are getting 2:1 calling a pot-sized bet. That means, if you hit, over the course of the hand, he needs to pay you off more than 3x the bet you just called, to make your call correct.

That's it, that's all you need to know. If you're certain he will pay you off a lot, you can call a pot bet.

This is often considered a bad play, because how can you be sure?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-08-2005, 07:24 AM
Brian462 Brian462 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Default Re: Implied value and draws

His call is bad I think. He has alot of ground to make up on later streets whenever he makes his hand, and if he knows he is winning your entire stack every time he gets there it's still not that profitable. Add in all the times he makes his hand and you fold, and those times he makes his hand and loses and it becomes a fairly -EV play.

If your stacks were bigger it would be a better play.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-08-2005, 10:58 AM
Jordan Olsommer Jordan Olsommer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 792
Default Re: Implied value and draws

[ QUOTE ]
Does implied value make it ok to call a pot sized bet on a draw?

Two questions:
Is calling a pot sized bet with his hand a good play?
If he somehow expected me to go all in on the turn, was it a good play?

[/ QUOTE ]

Like every other question in poker, "it depends". It depends on how likely you are to hit your draw, of course, but also how much you can conceivably milk out of your opponent if you do hit your draw (which is why you simply can't justify calling a huge bet with a gutshot by including "if I hit it, I win every chip on the table from everyone still in the hand" in your calculations).

So let's look at the math:
Your opponent has a double bellybuster draw, and is looking for a J or 7, so he has 8 outs on the next card only (I'm assuming that you're going to tap him on fourth street pretty much regardless of what comes up), so he's (from his point of view, not knowing our cards) 8/47 = .1702 to hit his nicely-concealed straight, and thus of course .8298 that he's going to miss on the next card and miss his chance because you're going to go all-in.

so what's his expectation?

.1702 he hits the straight and goes all-in, of which
- .1332 = he wins with his straight
- .037 = he hits his draw but you end up winning (filling up or making quads on the river)

so his real "win percentage" here (assuming youre not going to fold your set, no way, no how) is .1332

so .1332 of the time he wins all the chips he can, and .8668 of the time he loses his pot-sized investment

EV = (.1332)(115.50) + (.8668)(-15) =

...drumroll please...

$2.38.

Assuming you will always tap him on the turn, and that you will never fold, he makes $2.38 each time he makes that play.

Christ, it hardly seems worth even the emotional anguish of waiting on the outcome, does it? :P
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-08-2005, 11:11 AM
Jordan Olsommer Jordan Olsommer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 792
Default Re: Implied value and draws

Oh yeah, and in case you're not fond of mathematics and instead prefer an anecdotal answer to your question, this is how Stuey Ungar won the WSOP in 1980:

Doyle Brunson: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Stu Ungar: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Doyle raises pre-flop, Stu calls, Pot = about $17,000.

Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

Doyle makes a pot-sized bet ($17,000), Stu calls.

Turn: 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Stu bets $30,000, Doyle goes all-in, Stu calls.

River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Stu wins the hand with 5-high straight.

Stu called on the flop getting only 2-to-1 on an almost 12-to-1 shot, but as he later said, "I knew that if a 3 came up that I was going to bust [Doyle]"

So again, it depends.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.