|
|
#22
04-27-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If the NYT had covered Jesus in the Biblical times
I believe it would simply be "Jesus of Nazareth" or similar.
|
|
#23
04-27-2005, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If the NYT had covered Jesus in the Biblical times
I honestly don't see what the harm is in believing in a God. If there is heaven, and you believe in him, then you'll have eternal happiness. If you believe in him, and there is no heaven, then oh well, nothing happens when you die. But, if you don't believe in God, and there is a heaven, then you're [censored]. If you don't believe in him and there is no heaven, then oh well again.
So, really there is no hamr in believing in a higher being.
|
|
#24
04-27-2005, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If the NYT had covered Jesus in the Biblical times
[ QUOTE ]
I know English isnt your first language so I realize you may have some difficulty with comprehension. [/ QUOTE ] I guarantee you that Stan's English is better than your Finnish, or whatever other language besides English that you speak.
|
|
#25
04-27-2005, 08:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If the NYT had covered Jesus in the Biblical times
[ QUOTE ]
I guarantee you that Stan's English is better than your Finnish [/ QUOTE ] Probably. [ QUOTE ] or whatever other language besides English that you speak [/ QUOTE ] Doubt it. Nice of you to ride in on your white horse and try to save Stan but the fact is I wasnt trying to be a dick. It became pretty obvious to me that what he was saying was slightly off from what he meant to say. So in short, buzz off.
|
|
#28
04-28-2005, 01:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If the NYT had covered Jesus in the Biblical times
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] So in short, buzz off. [/ QUOTE ] You can go back to shooting Iraqis now. [/ QUOTE ] cunt. [/ QUOTE ] Evading the censors. Tsk tsk.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
