|
|
#111
12-10-2005, 03:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
In a website as big a 2+2, when trying to develop a following, you have to be 43 inches tall. [/ QUOTE ] fyp. could you be any more a moron in this thread? 
|
|
#113
12-10-2005, 04:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
Alright man. Just voicing my opinion that's all. [/ QUOTE ] I have 20 posts in this thread about my opinion. If those haven't swayed you then I'm not going to. The impossibilty of convincing you I'm right combined with its uselessness doesn't provide me any motivation to continue talking about it.
|
|
#114
12-10-2005, 04:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
Guys have waaaay higher standards for pictures of girls to jack off to than they do for girls to jack them off. This is common knowledge. We don't have absurd standards in real life.
|
|
#115
12-10-2005, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think a 5 or 6 doesn't meet your standards either. Honestly, would anyone in their right mind see Tyra Banks at a bar and react by thiking, "man, I'd like to bang her if only she could put a bag over her face so I wouldn't see her forehead"? [/ QUOTE ] I've thought this very though about Reese Witherspoon  Why am I so critical? Because the pursuit of perfection, though unattainable, is one of the noblest activities of man.
|
|
#116
12-10-2005, 04:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
Alright Evan, here goes:
all those models are extremely hot. I would do it with her, or any other VS model in a heartbeat. I will not deny this. Unfortunatley, the pics given had some problems: 1) the first model looked like she had been beaten by the mob IN THAT PIC, specifically on her leg. Does this stop me from doing it with her? No. But I will mention it. 2)Tyra banks looked uber bangable as usual, but I have always been put off by her forhead. Would she be the hottest thing I would have ever slept with? Yes. But i feel like I had to mention what I did and didn't like. 3) the idea that those models need sandwiches is absurd. People who usually say those girls need to eat something are usually doing one of two things: trying to impress other girls by saying they like fat chicks, or they themselves are fat.
|
|
#118
12-10-2005, 09:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
I think we should institute a new rule in this forum. If you make an outlandish statement saying that any girl that is extremely hot (at the discretion of the mods/general public) is "ugly", "disgusting", "looks like a transvestite" or really anything implying that you would not sleep with them you should be forced to post a picture of your significant other (or last SO if you don't currently have one). Failing to do so should result in punishment (one day ban, asterisk/star from Astroglide, whatever). [/ QUOTE ] [brag] I agree with this only because I can back my own ratings with pics of my exes...[/end brag]
|
|
#119
12-10-2005, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] She just thought she wouldn't get hoisted by her own petard. [/ QUOTE ] I've wanted to use this phrase ever since I heard it on Family Guy, but 10-1 says I would use it wrongly because I have no [censored] idea what it means. [/ QUOTE ] Just to confirm it's aptness for use in OOT, the word "petard" takes its origin from a Latin word meaning "fart".
|
|
#120
12-10-2005, 01:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
This is not a phenominon limited to OOT - it's every board on the net. It's basically just trying to convince everybody how much of a stud you are and implying that you have a supermodel girlfriend.
"Paris Hilton? Yuck" - as if everybody here wouldn't be on their knees kissing her feet and licking her snatch if they actually met her.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
