#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
876
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 222 [/ QUOTE ] do you think the microposter(current, past, and future) have/had/will have a bias against already knowledgable posters getting the spot microposters, and therefor avoid picking certain numbers? [/ QUOTE ] I thought it was picked at random, I would go down and play at 1/2 full ring(since it gets complained about too much) or 6max if I got this, not at my normal game |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
834
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
777
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
828
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
63, and boy do I need it, in the middle of a 240BB downswing. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
212
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
Ah the advantages of position...
Assuming that you will take the closest guess, that I want to win, and that I am not getting my guess in too late, I have determined the optimal answer to be... 694.5 If it has to be a whole number I'll take 694 (though 695 would be the same). Of course, my whole plan will be ruined if anyone answers after me. And by the way, when we started this I know there was some talk about possibly preferential treatment to people in a downswing, which I don't think happened. But I do favor it and I say choose the guy a few responses ago in the 240 BB downswing. Furthermore, if I win I would be happy to 'give' it to him if the forum is okay with that. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
444
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for a new MicroPoster...
it's clearly 974
|
|
|