Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2005, 08:18 PM
chapstick chapstick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 90
Default suited one-card-separated-connectors

I know there's a better name for HE hands like 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] but I forget what it is.

I'm trying to do an analysis of how many limpers I need to even consider playing them at the micro-levels (you know, some say play 'em with enough limpers, some say fold 'em). I need the probabalities of flopping a 4-flush, OESD, two-pair, trips, boats, etc. I think I can calculate these probabilities, and I'm sure I can simulate them, but I suspect they've been discussed here before. Does anyone know a link? Would anyone like me to post the numbers, or at least my attempt, when I get them? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2005, 08:41 PM
d10 d10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ft Campbell, KY
Posts: 313
Default Re: suited one-card-separated-connectors

I only play them in unraised pots in the big blind position. At least the lower ones. Maybe sometimes in the small blind position if there are a lot of limpers or if the card values are high enough. I'm probably a bit tight though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2005, 09:32 PM
chapstick chapstick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 90
Default Re: suited one-card-separated-connectors

[ QUOTE ]
I only play them in unraised pots in the big blind position. At least the lower ones. Maybe sometimes in the small blind position if there are a lot of limpers or if the card values are high enough. I'm probably a bit tight though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, there was some side-discussion in the micro-limit forums on playing this or not. I have generally stopped playing them, but I am starting to think if I have a bunch of passive opponents calling and no pre-flop raisers, I might be able to get away with it from the button. Really though, I'm more interested in just proving it to myself that it is a bad/good play.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-31-2005, 04:35 PM
nycplayer nycplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 106
Default Re: suited one-card-separated-connectors

I remrmber reading somewhere, that after millions of simulated hands, one-gap suited connectors did equally well as no-gap suited connectors.
I like playing them from late position against one or two big stacks. Sometimes I raise with 24, or 35. Easy to get away from and they pay off well when you hit the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2005, 04:39 AM
diebitter diebitter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 417
Default Re: suited one-card-separated-connectors

I've been wondering about these. I can believe they are better/as good as (in terms of EV) 0-gappers because
1) easier to get away from
2) IF they make a straight, it's more hidden than a 0-gapper straight (say you have 54 or 53, would a flop of 32A be more scary to opponents, or 42A? the first one, I'm thinking), so would be more profitable if played right
3) Again, if it makes a straight, it tends to spoil the upper end of the straight for others. For example you have 54s, and land 876, a single 9 held elsewhere or a turn/river of a 9 or T easily ruins your hand, - not so much so with 53s and 764

Check the EV stats for 10 players on http://www.pokerroom.com/games/evsta...php?players=10
- this shows in the main the EV for 1-gappers is a little lower, but it's how you play em, isn't it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.