|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
[ QUOTE ]
97. [/ QUOTE ] Then yeah, definitely more semi-bluffing these days. I know because when I was 13, me and my friends never really got that aggressive with draws. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
If we take "sound" to mean "nit" can we assume that they won't be raising a draw here?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
[ QUOTE ]
If we take "sound" to mean "nit" can we assume that they won't be raising a draw here? [/ QUOTE ] Sure. But we can also assume that it's possible they don't like raising with TT or JJ because "overcards always come." If they're really a nit, you can put some more $$$ in there and then comfortably fold to an all-in |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I'm glad we had this talk.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
[ QUOTE ]
"97" Then yeah, definitely more semi-bluffing these days. I know because when I was 13, me and my friends never really got that aggressive with draws. [/ QUOTE ] I could see folding bottom set here back in 1997, but only because I would have been too stoned back then to realize I flopped a set anyways. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
[ QUOTE ]
I could see folding bottom set here back in 1997, but only because I would have been too stoned back then to realize I flopped a set anyways. [/ QUOTE ] Well the sets they have today are WAY stronger than they were back in '97, so it all makes sense. |
|
|