Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2005, 03:44 AM
mperich mperich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 225
Default I\'m going to..

fold one pair on the river to a checkraise if i dont have a very specific read. I dont care what my kicker is.

-Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-16-2005, 04:53 AM
Stack Stack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leakin\'
Posts: 428
Default Re: I\'m going to..

[ QUOTE ]
fold one pair on the river to a checkraise if i dont have a very specific read. I dont care what my kicker is.

-Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

Well if this is approved by most around here, it could very well become "mperich's Theorem" [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

But I'm surprised that you don't mention the size of the pot. It doesn't matter to you?

Also, are you talking about top pair?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2005, 05:24 AM
mungpo mungpo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
Default Re: I\'m going to..

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2005, 05:27 AM
mperich mperich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 225
Default Re: I\'m going to..

I mean top pair yeah, and sometimes overpairs, like if a 3flush got completed etc. The standard response on here is call, its only 1 more bet, but you are not good 1/5 times or 1/10 times. Maybe 1/15. I can just feel the chips leaking when i think about it =O

-Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2005, 05:33 AM
GetThere1Time GetThere1Time is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ĄGAMBOOOOOOL!
Posts: 395
Default Re: I\'m going to..

Maybe at lower 6 max where players are more passive but 5/10+ there are just too many clowns trying to be fancy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-16-2005, 06:05 AM
mperich mperich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 225
Default Re: I\'m going to..

Well I just went through my database, and I counted 120 c/rs that could beat TPTK and 8 that couldnt. Although my sample size is biased because I filtered for players with 400 hands or more, so there are more good players than bad players I'm sure. I didnt wanna be here all night =P

Anyways, thats 15-1 (nice guess in OP [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]) Also, 3 of the 8 were by 1 player, who I think is one of the best 10/20'ers, and a 4th was from another known 2+2er. Also, note I didnt include my own stats because that would be a horrible bias hehe. I'd like to hear what others think.

-Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-16-2005, 06:27 AM
wheelz wheelz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canda
Posts: 163
Default Re: I\'m going to..

I think you already know which players you should be calling river CRs from, and the ones who you know don't do it a lot... well they can beat TPTK 15:1.

I was worried that my tendency to fold to river raises so often might start to hurt me, but you posting that makes me feel a lot better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-16-2005, 06:49 AM
GetThere1Time GetThere1Time is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ĄGAMBOOOOOOL!
Posts: 395
Default I\'ll take 15:1

I really don't think 15:1's too horrible when you take all factors into consideration.

I have no hard proof but lets say before the river your average pot is 7BB(I just tossed out a number), which might be a bit modest, your bet and his raise gives you 10:1 odds on calling the river c/r.

Take that and add in your own good situational reasoning even without a good read: using hand reading and board texture to determine if he could actually have the hand he's representing, the average player type for the game you're playing in, is he c/ring you or the field, etc. etc. I think good analysis of the situation bumps up your chances of winning.

Now I'm not saying that its clear to call every time or clear to fold everytime. My point is that it's close and shouldn't be an auto-muck.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-16-2005, 07:06 AM
Stack Stack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leakin\'
Posts: 428
Default Re: I\'ll take 15:1

I totally agree with your thoughts.

You can't automatically toss it. There are times that you really want to call against a clown. I find the op's finding intersting though. I'll look into my stats after I get some sleep.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-16-2005, 07:10 AM
mperich mperich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 225
Default Re: I\'ll take 15:1

Sorry, maybe my OP came off a little bit absolute. What I meant is I will be folding in this spot A LOT more than i have been, which up until now has been rarely. Of course there are always a lot of factors to be considered at the time. Basically I meant as a default play, if there is such a thing.

-Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.