#1
|
|||
|
|||
Implied Odds?
Does anyone call this? What about a raise to 6 or 8?
***** Hand History for Game 3162485215 ***** $200 NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, December 07, 21:33:41 EDT 2005 Table Table 69192 (Real Money) Seat 1 is the button Total number of players : 10 Seat 10: Gambler9305 ( $207 ) Seat 5: papag0rgi0 ( $354.05 ) Seat 2: jimmyfloyd79 ( $231.15 ) Seat 3: WGHarding ( $194.75 ) Seat 1: GA_bound ( $225.25 ) Seat 8: WhiteCoyote ( $98.29 ) Seat 6: ZZmen ( $102.60 ) Seat 4: BBBill_92679 ( $257.95 ) Seat 7: Yohda ( $196 ) Seat 9: lasophis ( $215.65 ) jimmyfloyd79 posts small blind [$1]. WGHarding posts big blind [$2]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to papag0rgi0 [ 7d 7c ] BBBill_92679 folds. papag0rgi0 calls [$2]. ZZmen folds. Yohda folds. WhiteCoyote folds. lasophis folds. Gambler9305 folds. GA_bound calls [$2]. jimmyfloyd79 raises [$9]. WGHarding folds. papag0rgi0 folds. GA_bound folds. jimmyfloyd79 does not show cards. jimmyfloyd79 wins $16 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
sorry for all the questions, i'm trying to do away with my old weak-tight playstyle and get better.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
Bukem, change the 7's to 22-55. Still an insta-call?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
[ QUOTE ]
Bukem, change the 7's to 22-55. Still an insta-call? [/ QUOTE ] yes. goto ssnl and look at the bottom of the faq for the 5/10 rule. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
I will always call this standard raise for set value. I will occassionally bring this in for a PFR into an unraised pot from any position to make it difficult for opponents to put me on a hand.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
Call, mmmmm and its not even close.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
Yes call. Also, you dont need to keep posting hands, I think it would be more beneficial for you to go and read alot of ssnl posts or post these hands there. Most of these are basic strategy and thought, so if you are not sure of them, dont be embarassed, but go learn.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
My personal opinion gleaned from 2+2 is that playing the smaller sets 22-55 is questionable. Maybe a longterm (how long is that?) break-even prop. For every time you stack someone you'll get stacked with set over set. Fine for long-term, but the highest of highs and the lowest of lows the moment it happens. If there's really no plus EV to this then I limit their use to LP where I can at least play with position. Just personal taste. I really hate trying to play a difficult villain OOP, or an unknown. To me it always pays to know who I have position on, and who has position on me.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Implied Odds?
Texas poker what game are you playing right now?
Can you figure out my old party name? |
|
|