|
|
#41
12-10-2005, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] -Renee Zelweger [/ QUOTE ] Danza says:  [/ QUOTE ]  i was wrong? [/ QUOTE ] she's the not hot version of joey lauren adams 
|
|
#42
12-10-2005, 01:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Scotch Disliker, I agree with you, and I think one of the ways we can solve this is by making the 3 point scale mandatory. TONY [/ QUOTE ] I like the idea of the 3 point scale. I think a 4 point scale would be ideal, though. There is a relatively strong case to be made for [censored] a 50th percentile girl while I don't think that's the case for a 33rd percentile girl. [/ QUOTE ] How about, 1. No Way In Hell 2. I'd have to be drunk 3. Only if I hadn't gotten laid in a while 4. I'd Hit It [/ QUOTE ] The problem is this scale would be useless when comparing models to other models. They would always be fours, yet people would obviously think some were better than others. It just wouldn't work, IMO. Also, I don't think anyone will ever be required to post a picture of any kind on 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] if we can makes rules about not saying the word "poker" I don't see why we can't do this. Fwiw I never thought of making this rule in Politics, I promise.
|
|
#43
12-10-2005, 01:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] -Renee Zelweger [/ QUOTE ] Danza says: [/ QUOTE ] Renee Zelwegger is one of the most unattractive mainstream female celebrities. In fact, she almost looks mannish which completely contradicts your stupid, stupid post.
|
|
#44
12-10-2005, 01:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I like a 10 as much as anyone, but that doesn't mean I actually think an 8 or a 7 doesn't meet my standards. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think a 5 or 6 doesn't meet your standards either. [/ QUOTE ] Unless I'm misunderstanding you, that's a real weird thing to say and doesn't make sense. I don't know what you think a 5 or 6 is, but I know what I think a 5 or 6 is. I also know my standards, and I have no idea how you could possibly think you know them better than me. Who is attracted to what he considers unattractive? By definition ... [ QUOTE ] Honestly, would anyone in their right mind see Tyra Banks at a bar and react by thiking, "man, I'd like to bang her if only she could put a bag over her face so I wouldn't see her forehead"? Basically I think having this forum reflect reality, even slightly, is a good thing. [/ QUOTE ] As for Tyra Banks, she's got a very pointy chin and a high forehead, and I would count her as an easy 9 or better. Funny thing is, though, there's so much variation even between 9 and 10. I count her way higher since I've seen her talk show and seen that she actually seems to have some kind of a personality and reasonable intelligence.
|
|
#45
12-10-2005, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] -Renee Zelweger [/ QUOTE ] Danza says: [/ QUOTE ] i was wrong? [/ QUOTE ] she's the not hot version of joey lauren adams [/ QUOTE ] more like 
|
|
#46
12-10-2005, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
if we can makes rules about not saying the word "poker" I don't see why we can't do this. [/ QUOTE ] That's not at all the same as requiring someone to post RL pictures just to keep his status on 2+2.
|
|
#47
12-10-2005, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm glad someone made a thread about this because this has been bugging me for a while too. That VS thread is ridiculous. I love that a bunch of people even said "gross what's with her leg" at the obvious reflection off the stage, which should be obvious to anyone that is not half retarded. [/ QUOTE ] I made a decision to let the people that couldn't figure that out off the hook. It was close though, because that is both really stupid and a really petty reason to insult a girl as hot as Adriana Lima. [/ QUOTE ] I suspect she might read this forum only infrequently.
|
|
#49
12-10-2005, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
I think a good addition to the picture requirement is that you must be in the picture yourself. If you are not in the OOT photo directory you must also provide a picture of you in front of 2+2 signed in on your name. You can never be too careful. [/ QUOTE ] also, anyone who disagrees with any law of these United States must submit a picture of themselves with their juris doctorate degree and bar card. we don't want any of the proletariat voicing their opinions now do we. always careful, Jeff
|
|
#50
12-10-2005, 01:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
pointing out the lack of beauty of: -Ashley Simpson -Drew Barrymore -Renee Zelweger is still ok, right? [/ QUOTE ] I'm with you on the first two, but think Renee can be made to look decent, partly on the charm factor. She was hard not to like in that Jerry Maguire movie. Ashlee Simpson doesn't look good at all to me. Drew Barrymore has very forgettable looks, but is pretty in tha tkind of, I-like-her-because-she's-my-friend kind of way. If she weren't a movie star nobody would have thought she was a natural as a Charlie's Angel.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
