|
|
#32
12-10-2005, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think not knowing what OOT members look like is one of the best parts about it. No offense dudes, but I don't give a damn what you look like and I'm not curious. [/ QUOTE ] I don't particularly care what "OOT members" look like. I am curious who someone is banging if they said that Adriana Lima or Tyra Banks is not drop dead gorgeous. [/ QUOTE ] Ok I have no idea who this Adriana is. I looked at the series of photos at the top of that thread and I am still not impressed. I don't think she looks like a transvestite. I don't think she is ugly. I however don't think she is even close to drop dead gorgeous. *** Disclaimer - The only pics I have seen of her are from that thread. *** Just because you are so enamoured with her does not mean that everyone else is a retard for not being impressed. 
|
|
#33
12-10-2005, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
If by -Ashley Simpson -Drew Barrymore -Renee Zelweger you mean -Ashley Simpson -Ashley Simpson -Ashley Simpson then I agree [/ QUOTE ] Saying that Ashley Simpson has a big nose or even an ugly face is fine. Implying that you would not bang her til your dick fell off, in my opinion, would warrent you posting a pic. The paper bag comment, in her case, is okay by me because the body/face juxtoposition is SO stark. Let's not lose sight of the fact that she has an insane body.
|
|
#35
12-10-2005, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
edited, because
|
|
#36
12-10-2005, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Scotch Disliker, I agree with you, and I think one of the ways we can solve this is by making the 3 point scale mandatory. TONY [/ QUOTE ] I like the idea of the 3 point scale. I think a 4 point scale would be ideal, though. There is a relatively strong case to be made for [censored] a 50th percentile girl while I don't think that's the case for a 33rd percentile girl. [/ QUOTE ] How about, 1. No Way In Hell 2. I'd have to be drunk 3. Only if I hadn't gotten laid in a while 4. I'd Hit It
|
|
#38
12-10-2005, 01:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
p.s. i would not, and have never, dated a girl that isn't more attractive than those 3 hags. [/ QUOTE ] 1) Based on the amount of effort you put into trying to bang Olivia* I'm almost positive this is not true. Furthermore, I'm more focused on girls you'd hook up with than girls you'd date. 2) If this is true, you should be overjoyed about getting a chance to post those pictures for all to see when you insult an agreed upon hottie. *Olivia, while very cute, is not hot enough that I would believe you'd never hook up with a girl worse than Drew Barrymore.
|
|
#40
12-10-2005, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Scotch Disliker, I agree with you, and I think one of the ways we can solve this is by making the 3 point scale mandatory. TONY [/ QUOTE ] I like the idea of the 3 point scale. I think a 4 point scale would be ideal, though. There is a relatively strong case to be made for [censored] a 50th percentile girl while I don't think that's the case for a 33rd percentile girl. [/ QUOTE ] How about, 1. No Way In Hell 2. I'd have to be drunk 3. Only if I hadn't gotten laid in a while 4. I'd Hit It [/ QUOTE ] The problem is this scale would be useless when comparing models to other models. They would always be fours, yet obviously people would think some were better than others. It just wouldn't work, IMO. Also, I don't think anyone will ever be required to post a picture of any kind on 2+2.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
