#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Frank\'s Error in Barron\'s Article
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Hi Everyone: I know that Barron's article has been getting a lot of attention (as usual). But there's an error that Frank makes which I don't think anyone has addressed. His error is that even though he's a 2+2er, he didn't read our books as well as he should of. [/ QUOTE ] Mason, Gotta correct you since this is a pet peeve of mine. There is no such thing as "should of". It is "should have" or "should've". [/ QUOTE ] you people really need to stop using threaded mode. [/ QUOTE ] you finally came around [/ QUOTE ] huh? ive used flat for as long as I can remember... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Frank\'s Error in Barron\'s Article
"What this means in practice is that if your opponent bets in a situation where he thinks he might be able to get away with a bluff, you have to give more consideration to calling him, even with a mediocre hand."
So then all the less reason, given that BVT sized up Frank as a devoted 2+2er, to attempt the play he attempted. |
|
|