|
View Poll Results: Who deleted my masturbation thread ? | |||
Other | 6 | 20.00% | |
Angry Cola | 1 | 3.33% | |
Johnny Boom Boom | 1 | 3.33% | |
Wacki | 3 | 10.00% | |
Dynasty | 12 | 40.00% | |
Matt | 7 | 23.33% | |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A disagreement over AK
[ QUOTE ]
I used to fold this a lot. Now I call a lot. [/ QUOTE ] Do you really miss threaded mode? wtf?!?!? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A disagreement over AK
and what if villian was a bigger stack?
would you call 1350 for 1575 chips in this situation? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A disagreement over AK
[ QUOTE ]
The poster I was disagreeing with said that if you plug TT+/AK into pusher's range, it's a fold...and it's not that close. THat boggled my mind and I really didn't believe him. [/ QUOTE ] I have been thinking more about this and I am not sure its entirely correct to include AA and KK in his range. I know, I know. Villain should re-raise all in here with those hands. And I know every 2+2er insists that they psuh their AA and KK here in Villain's spot. That doesn't make it true though. A significant portion of Party players and, yes, even 2+2ers raise this back to 450 "hoping for action". Even at the 109s ans the 215s. I call this all-in with just one other player in the pot with the given stack sizes and even the TT+, AK range as quickly as possible. And while its not horrible to fold and it probably doesn't qualify as a big leak I think folding here will decrease your overall ROI at any level. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A disagreement over AK
You basically have to call. |
|
|