|
|
#12
11-24-2005, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
Looks to me like it's very likely Chicago will get a bye. I doubt the Seahawks collapse, and Seattle will have home-field throughout the playoffs. New York will probably go on the road to either Seattle or Chicago, and lose. Seattle will beat Chicago at home, but it'd be a damned good game. [/ QUOTE ] As a Bears fan, I'd certainly welcome a Hawks/Bears NFC Championship game, whether it would be in Chicago or Seattle. 
|
|
#13
11-24-2005, 12:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
Alot of credit to the Seahawks not blowing up [/ QUOTE ] The season is still very young my friend. Only beating San Fran by 2 points could be an omen to the near future.
|
|
#14
11-24-2005, 02:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
Looks to me like it's very likely Chicago will get a bye. I doubt the Seahawks collapse, and Seattle will have home-field throughout the playoffs. New York will probably go on the road to either Seattle or Chicago, and lose. Seattle will beat Chicago at home, but it'd be a damned good game. [/ QUOTE ] Chicago loses to Tampa, Pitt, and ATL this yr, maybe MN go in as the 4seed or miss if they lose to MN
|
|
#15
11-24-2005, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Looks to me like it's very likely Chicago will get a bye. I doubt the Seahawks collapse, and Seattle will have home-field throughout the playoffs. New York will probably go on the road to either Seattle or Chicago, and lose. Seattle will beat Chicago at home, but it'd be a damned good game. [/ QUOTE ] Chicago loses to Tampa, Pitt, and ATL this yr, maybe MN go in as the 4seed or miss if they lose to MN [/ QUOTE ] Chicago is better than ATL and host them. They've already trounced MN 28-3 and Minnesota's god awful. They're better than Tampa.
|
|
#16
11-24-2005, 08:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Looks to me like it's very likely Chicago will get a bye. I doubt the Seahawks collapse, and Seattle will have home-field throughout the playoffs. New York will probably go on the road to either Seattle or Chicago, and lose. Seattle will beat Chicago at home, but it'd be a damned good game. [/ QUOTE ] Chicago loses to Tampa, Pitt, and ATL this yr, maybe MN go in as the 4seed or miss if they lose to MN [/ QUOTE ] Chicago is better than ATL and host them. They've already trounced MN 28-3 and Minnesota's god awful. They're better than Tampa. [/ QUOTE ] I'll be at that game on Sunday night, and it will be very cold, which will give the Bears a big advantage. It depends on which Falcons team shows up to the game. There's no way that the current MN team is going to beat the Bears in their last meeting of the season.
|
|
#17
11-24-2005, 10:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
The same Falcons team shows up every game, the only difference is that they haven't recovered fumbles lately.
|
|
#18
11-25-2005, 12:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
Based on some very rough calculations, I have the NFC Championship going to: Seahawks - 64% Giants - 30% Somebody else - 6% Comments? [/ QUOTE ] And for the record, where are you from and what is your favorite football team?
|
|
#19
11-25-2005, 03:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
And for the record, where are you from and what is your favorite football team? [/ QUOTE ] I live in Tacoma, WA. I am a diehard Seahawks fan.
|
|
#20
11-26-2005, 05:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Odds on NFC Champs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Looks to me like it's very likely Chicago will get a bye. I doubt the Seahawks collapse, and Seattle will have home-field throughout the playoffs. New York will probably go on the road to either Seattle or Chicago, and lose. Seattle will beat Chicago at home, but it'd be a damned good game. [/ QUOTE ] Chicago loses to Tampa, Pitt, and ATL this yr, maybe MN go in as the 4seed or miss if they lose to MN [/ QUOTE ] Chicago is better than ATL and host them. They've already trounced MN 28-3 and Minnesota's god awful. They're better than Tampa. [/ QUOTE ] um they almost lost to NO, and Det on the road, and did lose their other 2road games .. MN is better than both NO and Det Tampa is at home, again look at how the bears have played on the road this yr ... their record is a by product of a favorable home/away ratio, with 2games against winning teams both at home, they aren't a 7-3 caliber team, more like a decent 6-4, 5-5team .. and not a bye team one last thing the first MN game was after the boat incident, and you only managed 200ish yds offense .. scoring because of special teams and turnovers .. it was not exactly a superdominating performance, and MN is playing better now
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
