|
|
#33
10-16-2005, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mod Battle Round 2
[ QUOTE ]
While we are voting people off the island, how about a "worst moderator" and that person loses his/her moderating authority. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think people would really vote on moderating ability? 
|
|
#35
10-16-2005, 11:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mod Battle Round 2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] While we are voting people off the island, how about a "worst moderator" and that person loses his/her moderating authority. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think people would really vote on moderating ability? [/ QUOTE ] I think that it's inconceivable that each of 30ish moderators are all good. Whichever one gets voted off, regardless of *why* people voted him/her off, is overwhelmingly likely to suck at some part of the job.
|
|
#36
10-16-2005, 11:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mod Battle Round 2
[ QUOTE ]
Technically Mat is an administrator and not a moderator? Red > Green [/ QUOTE ] this is true, but i included him because he is listed as a moderator of certain forums.
|
|
#37
10-16-2005, 11:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mod Battle Round 2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] While we are voting people off the island, how about a "worst moderator" and that person loses his/her moderating authority. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think people would really vote on moderating ability? [/ QUOTE ] I think that it's inconceivable that each of 30ish moderators are all good. Whichever one gets voted off, regardless of *why* people voted him/her off, is overwhelmingly likely to suck at some part of the job. [/ QUOTE ] this might be true if it was a site wide vote, but if held in OOT it would likely be some mod from a forum that no one has ever heard of.
|
|
#38
10-16-2005, 11:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mod Battle Round 2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] While we are voting people off the island, how about a "worst moderator" and that person loses his/her moderating authority. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think people would really vote on moderating ability? [/ QUOTE ] I think that it's inconceivable that each of 30ish moderators are all good. Whichever one gets voted off, regardless of *why* people voted him/her off, is overwhelmingly likely to suck at some part of the job. [/ QUOTE ] While i agree that it's likely that the mod voted off would be a poor moderator i think there is still a fair chance that the person voted off is actually a good moderator. Taking action like that based on an OOT poll seems silly to me. This is especially true because of how much gimmick account spoofing is done in these polls (unless you run it with this one and have someone hand tally it). I'd probably support it if instead of voting off the moderator who loses we take the top who highest vote counts and create a "do you want to keep x as a mod" poll in their respective forum.
|
|
#39
10-16-2005, 11:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mod Battle Round 2
[ QUOTE ]
I'd probably support it if instead of voting off the moderator who loses we take the top who highest vote counts and create a "do you want to keep x as a mod" poll in their respective forum [/ QUOTE ] That seems like a reasonable idea.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
