|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Ultimate Bet | |||
| Unfavorable |
   
|
38 | 25.00% |
| No Opinion / Neutral / Don't Know |
  
|
39 | 25.66% |
| Favorable |
  
|
75 | 49.34% |
| Voters: 152. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
07-25-2005, 10:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
Also, the reading comprehension is unsurprisingly low on OOT. "Most women" dooders. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, exactly, which is why I voted for high rise. Hot women look way better with low rise but most women look awful in them. 
|
|
#12
07-25-2005, 01:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, the reading comprehension is unsurprisingly low on OOT. "Most women" dooders. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, exactly, which is why I voted for high rise. Hot women look way better with low rise but most women look awful in them. [/ QUOTE ] Women who look awful in low rise look awful anyway though. It isn't a function of the jeans. Women who are hot will look hotter in low rise jeans.
|
|
#13
07-25-2005, 01:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
Women who look awful in low rise look awful anyway though. It isn't a function of the jeans. Women who are hot will look hotter in low rise jeans. [/ QUOTE ] Quite possibly, but irrelevant to the question as posed.
|
|
#14
07-25-2005, 01:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
It depends on the girls build. If she is slim then lowcut, heavy then high waisted.
|
|
#15
07-25-2005, 01:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
It's not the high-waistedness or low-waistedness of the jeans that I have issues with. It's that most of the low-waisted jeans are very oddly cut and very unflattering. The put those weird gigantic pockets on them too that cover the bottom half of the ass and are down on the legs. If they would just do a better job of making them both low-waisted and cutting them to be more flattering, I'd be happy.....that and issue citations to fat girls caught wearing them. [/ QUOTE ] I'm an ass-man at heart. So yes, I agree completely. Even women in incredible shape with incredible asses look frumpy in low-cuts. High cut and in my early 1980s memories ... camel toe ... LOL ... those are the way to go. J/K on the camel toe thing, that was kinda sad actually.
|
|
#16
07-25-2005, 02:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
Most women are overweight. #1 is the choice.
Women managed to look sexy in jeans before this latest fashion trend, too. I do think the ass crack showing is a little stupid. If all women were aerobics instructors, I'd be more tempted to choose the low-cut. But I still think there's something inherently dumb looking about having your ass crack showing and your pants looking like they're about to fall off. I guess after 20 years of even white boys wearing gangsta pants as big as tents all the way down at their knees, it's the femme's turn to look stupid, though.
|
|
#17
07-25-2005, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
Most women are overweight. #1 is the choice. Women managed to look sexy in jeans before this latest fashion trend, too. I do think the ass crack showing is a little stupid. If all women were aerobics instructors, I'd be more tempted to choose the low-cut. But I still think there's something inherently dumb looking about having your ass crack showing and your pants looking like they're about to fall off. I guess after 20 years of even white boys wearing gangsta pants as big as tents all the way down at their knees, it's the femme's turn to look stupid, though. [/ QUOTE ] This doesn't make sense. You can always look away from the big ones, which you would regardless of pant size. But it is much better to look at the hot ones with low cut.
|
|
#18
07-25-2005, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
Hey Rick, for future reference, you're talking the difference between high and low rise pants. And pants that sit on the natural waist (i.e. slightly below the belly button) are high rise pants. [/ QUOTE ] You're right. I should have worded it: "the natural waist" or "thin part of the waist". I think I would have gotton more votes for the higher waist. ~ Rick
|
|
#19
07-25-2005, 06:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Hey Rick, for future reference, you're talking the difference between high and low rise pants. And pants that sit on the natural waist (i.e. slightly below the belly button) are high rise pants. [/ QUOTE ] You're right. I should have worded it: "the natural waist" or "thin part of the waist". I think I would have gotton more votes for the higher waist. ~ Rick [/ QUOTE ] That's how I understood it and voted...It was fairly obvious what you meant... Anyway, both these are cool, but where is the "big boops and a half-shirt" option?
|
|
#20
07-25-2005, 06:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll Inspired by Wacki - Low Cut or High Waisted Pants?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Women who look awful in low rise look awful anyway though. It isn't a function of the jeans. Women who are hot will look hotter in low rise jeans. [/ QUOTE ] Quite possibly, but irrelevant to the question as posed. [/ QUOTE ] Yes and no.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
