Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-26-2005, 08:35 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

Or TT, or AQ, or 88.. just about anything with the donks around, to be honest.
  #22  
Old 10-26-2005, 09:08 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

I was the third one in with KK from the bb in a 55 yesterday, and was up against AQo and A6s. So no, never fold, except for the aforementioned ridiculous bubble scenarios.
  #23  
Old 10-26-2005, 10:41 AM
downtown downtown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 33
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

[ QUOTE ]
Pocket Kings should never be folded preflop at partypoker in the $33s or $55s regardless of the betting action.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's an example of a $55 hand I played this past Monday.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t15 (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

MP1 (t1000)
MP2 (t1000)
Hero (t1000)
CO (t1000)
Button (t1000)
SB (t1000)
BB (t1000)
UTG (t1000)
UTG+1 (t1000)
UTG+2 (t1000)

Preflop:
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls t15, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t75</font>, CO calls t75, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to t1000 (All-In)</font>, BB calls t985 (All-In), UTG+1 folds, MPC folds, CO folds.

As Hero, I fold QQ here only with a read (i.e. I've played you a few times before and I have some sort of notes), and I call KK regardless (&lt;-- [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ) of read. I did fold QQ here because I did have notes and a read on the SB from previous games, and got to see KK from the SB. I would have called if it was two randoms.

I can't imagine the situation where I'd fold KK in a $33 or $55 SNG. Even with a very strong read, there is just too much chance it could be AKs or QQ.
  #24  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:14 AM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rochester, NH
Posts: 400
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

[ QUOTE ]
dont forget that youll flop a K when you do run into AA.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate this reasoning. I've always hated this reasoning and I don't understand why people use it.
  #25  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:16 AM
Nicholasp27 Nicholasp27 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

i don't think anyone uses it as reasoning

it's just a joke
  #26  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:23 AM
fluorescenthippo fluorescenthippo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 44s
Posts: 320
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

i folded KK at a 55 lvl 1.

utg limps, MP1 minraises, I reraises from CO, SB reraises around half his stack, utg limp reraises all in, MP1 calls.

im still not sure if i liked my fold. they turned up QQ, JJ, and 99 or something.
  #27  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:24 AM
Nicholasp27 Nicholasp27 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

they turn up things other than AA often enough to make it +ev to push/call push with KK
  #28  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:33 AM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rochester, NH
Posts: 400
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

[ QUOTE ]
i don't think anyone uses it as reasoning

it's just a joke

[/ QUOTE ]

I see it waaaaay too often without the smiley faces for it to be a joke. I think people actually factor the chances that they will hit into their decision, and neglect to factor in the chance that someone else will hit on them if they're the one ahead.
  #29  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:43 AM
MegaBet MegaBet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Death&variance are inevitable
Posts: 645
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i don't think anyone uses it as reasoning

it's just a joke

[/ QUOTE ]

I see it waaaaay too often without the smiley faces for it to be a joke. I think people actually factor the chances that they will hit into their decision, and neglect to factor in the chance that someone else will hit on them if they're the one ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

kyro, you need a doctor...your sarcasm detector is broken.
  #30  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:52 AM
Exitonly Exitonly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3
Default Re: Is this statement 100% true?

[ QUOTE ]
I think people actually factor the chances that they will hit into their decision

[/ QUOTE ]

This should be part of your decision?

you still have 20% to crack aces.. why wouldn't your chance to win vs one of his possible hands, be a factor in making yoru decision?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.