Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2005, 05:56 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pocket 77

Would you bet the flop?

What to do on the river UI if one person comes with me? I favour c/c, but could you justify c/f?

Cryptologic 1.00/2.00 Hold'em <font color="#0000FF">(10 handed)</font> link

Preflop: Hero is SB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (4.00 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks, MP2 checks, Button checks.

Turn: (2.00 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, MP2 folds, Button folds.

Final Pot: 3.00 BB.
Results in white below:<font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero doesn't show.
</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:20 PM
moose47 moose47 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 53
Default Re: Pocket 77

[ QUOTE ]
Would you bet the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

No.


[ QUOTE ]
What to do on the river UI if one person comes with me? I favour c/c, but could you justify c/f?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd c/f. Do you really think your hand is best if you are called on the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:33 PM
DCWildcat DCWildcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 358
Default Re: Pocket 77

I think c/c is the worst of our river options. The pot is wayyyy too small to justify calling. Bet/fold is favorable to c/c for a few reasons:
1) We're preventing them from bluffing
2) We might make a better hand fold
3) If they call, we lose. If they raise, we fold, knowing we're beat.

So we get the same information, plus the chance to buy the pot or make them fold a better hand, by b/f.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:34 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pocket 77

wouldnt bet the flop
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:37 PM
DCWildcat DCWildcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 358
Default Re: Pocket 77

All that doesn't mean b/f is the best option, though. With one opponent, we'd be getting 4 to 1. So we need to be good 1 in 5 times for it to be successful. That's only 20%. Any kind of weak-tight will fold that often, as will most TAGs. So a bet would be good against them. Calling stations and habitual bluff-raisers won't, so don't bet against them.

All of that only applies to 1 opponent, though. With more than 1 opponent, in this small pot, a c/f is pretty easy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:39 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pocket 77

Either c/f or b/f. c/c is horrid
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:40 PM
DCWildcat DCWildcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 358
Default Re: Pocket 77

[ QUOTE ]
Either c/f or b/c. c/c is horrid

[/ QUOTE ]

I think a b/c is pretty horrid. Other than a bluff, what raises on the river that we beat? We're an underpair to the board.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-22-2005, 06:48 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pocket 77

Agreed; I meant b/f. My mistake ;o
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-22-2005, 07:15 PM
nomadtla nomadtla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Open Till Midnight
Posts: 444
Default Re: Pocket 77

I think Bet/fold is a sillier option then c/c personally.

If they just call the turn bet then they will probably just call the river bet. Where as a check might enduce a bluff enough times to make it worth a call. I don't advocate the c/c line either. I see it as C/f &gt;&gt; c/c &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; B/f
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-22-2005, 07:53 PM
DCWildcat DCWildcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 358
Default Re: Pocket 77

[ QUOTE ]
I think Bet/fold is a sillier option then c/c personally.

If they just call the turn bet then they will probably just call the river bet. Where as a check might enduce a bluff enough times to make it worth a call. I don't advocate the c/c line either. I see it as C/f &gt;&gt; c/c &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; B/f

[/ QUOTE ]

A call here would be atrocious with our hand and the pot size. At this limit, a villain line of call-&gt;fold is far more likely than call-&gt;bluff.

This whole situation is still very read dependent, which is why I harped on it in my earlier post.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.