|
|
#51
12-14-2005, 05:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
I like the * system. I hate it when every post in the forum has somebody else calling for the OP to get a *. [/ QUOTE ] * 
|
|
#54
12-14-2005, 07:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
Well, we're nothing if not creative.
|
|
#55
12-19-2005, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
The common misconception on 2+2 is that it was built for OOT, but let us not fool ourselves, 2+2 will and always be a poker forum. As you browse the general poker forums you'll see posters (some good, some bad) with *'s in their name. I find it extremely moronic that posters who come to post on a poker forum are being banned and "given strikes" that can ban them from the whole of 2+2 because Astroglide thinks their "OOT" posts aren't funny enough. I think the *'s are a good system and should be given to people who use offensive material and breaking the basic ToS... [/ QUOTE ] I completely agree with all of the above. Quite frankly, this whole 'asterisk business' becoming a pathetic obsession for some. I think OOT should remain as it was before, and those that belong to the 'moderating clique' can start a whole new Forum of their own - with all of its 5-7 members. They could even call it: The *** Forum. Adam
|
|
#57
12-19-2005, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
who effing cares...you have a * under your name...so what?? people take internet message boards WAAAAAY to seriously [/ QUOTE ] You said it. Adam
|
|
#58
12-19-2005, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
Well, given that I have no astericks, but a banned account, I think the "*"s are a good idea.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
