|
|
|
|
#1
12-29-2005, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another AA hand **yawn**
Just wondering, why the t100 raise pf?
|
|
#2
12-29-2005, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another AA hand **yawn**
Yeah, I raise more than this even without a limper in front of me....?
|
|
#3
12-29-2005, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another AA hand **yawn**
[ QUOTE ]
Just wondering, why the t100 raise pf? [/ QUOTE ] Are you asking why I don't raise more? Otherwise, I don't know what you're getting at. And if so, what do you recommend and why?
|
|
#4
12-29-2005, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another AA hand **yawn**
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Just wondering, why the t100 raise pf? [/ QUOTE ] Are you asking why I don't raise more? Otherwise, I don't know what you're getting at. And if so, what do you recommend and why? [/ QUOTE ] I'm making this 100 PF too. Making it 120 or so preflop is unnecessary. At the $33s, it will fold around too often. You want action with this hand, so i don't see a problem with it.
|
|
#5
12-29-2005, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another AA hand **yawn**
I would have raised more. With a limper and 30BB, I would have made it at least 150. I would have raised more with AK as well. I would have made it 120.
Just wondering what your rationale for (what seems to me like) a low raise. I really like to thin the field and make one player pay to catch up, not give two or three odds to call/chase.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
