|
|
#21
10-10-2005, 06:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would beef up the line and see if we could draft Vince Young from UT. He seems to have good football sense and also is very mobile. [/ QUOTE ] hahahahahbust. and no Vince Young, i don't say this because you beat OSU. [/ QUOTE ] What about Michael Robinson? 
|
|
#22
10-10-2005, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
Robinson looked like a beast against OSU. Mostly running though. Probably definitely has a future in the NFL at wideout or running back. Would suppose wideout. Troy Smith is supposed to be an athletic Qb but he looked like no match for robbinson in terms of athleticism.
|
|
#23
10-10-2005, 08:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
[ QUOTE ]
There is nothing wrong with David Carr. If he didn't play for an inept franchise with an inadequate front office, overmatched coaching staff, miserable line and crappy defense he would be one of the better quarterbacks in the league. [/ QUOTE ] This is more correct than the other responses. People love to blame a single person or say a single person sucks in football when it is really hard for it to be one individual's fault. He has a good RB, that's about it. Everyone says AJ is a stud because he started good last year. Then they started to focus on him and now he can't get open. The fact that they have no real threat to speak of on the other side doesn't help. His OL is pathetic as everyone knows. They have given up 27 sacks in 4 games with a mobile QB. Imagine if Warner was back there. The coaching staff and front office sucks. I mean, last year they traded a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th to move up 13 spots to get Jason Babin, who was benched this year. They already fired their O-Coordinator and the rest of the staff will go at seasons end. Put him on a team like the Bengals or Detroit and he is putting up very good numbers.
|
|
#24
10-10-2005, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
The Babin decision deserves a special sucktacular asterisk in the history books.
|
|
#26
10-10-2005, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
He's probably around an average or slightly below average QB. Definitely hurt by his team.
|
|
#27
10-11-2005, 09:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
[ QUOTE ]
He's probably around an average or slightly below average QB. [/ QUOTE ] This is true, but we'll never know how much of this is due to the fact that he never had a chance to learn anything or develop before being thrown in as a starter on an expansion team as a rookie.
|
|
#28
10-11-2005, 09:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He's probably around an average or slightly below average QB. [/ QUOTE ] This is true, but we'll never know how much of this is due to the fact that he never had a chance to learn anything or develop before being thrown in as a starter on an expansion team as a rookie. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. That's the best and worst thing about football.
|
|
#29
10-11-2005, 02:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
[ QUOTE ]
He's probably around an average or slightly below average QB. Definitely hurt by his team. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. I read that he's lost all semblance of confidence too. I guess that'll happen when you get hit on every play.
|
|
#30
10-11-2005, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: General Consenus on David Carr
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] draft Vince Young from UT [/ QUOTE ] Yeah. This would be insanely popular in Texas - for a year. That is, until they find out he's more Kordell Stewart or Antwaan Randle El than Michael Vick. [/ QUOTE ] He's not as fast as Vick, but he's certainly a much better prospect than Kordell ever was. Randle El doesn't even come into the equation because he was never really considered a QB prospect.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
