Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2005, 11:28 AM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

From villain's perspective, he can get away from a ton of hands when you raise him both on the flop and turn. If you call the turn, you get more money in on the river against many of those hands that either block bet or check/call to snap off a bluff on the end. Whether or not cards kill your action is irrelevant if raising kills your action 100% of the time. Clearly, if villain is strong (as he was in this case or would be if he had a set), the money goes in pretty easily anyway. You can't stack him if he's not that strong no matter what you do but you can get a little more value out of your hand when he doesn't have a monster by calling the turn. The only time you lose is when villain would've played a big pot on the turn (with a set for example) but won't on a scary river.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2005, 12:58 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

[ QUOTE ]
You can't stack him if he's not that strong no matter what you do but you can get a little more value out of your hand when he doesn't have a monster by calling the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

How? What are we putting him on that bets flop, turn, and river, that isn't going to be calling my raise?


[ QUOTE ]
The only time you lose is when villain would've played a big pot on the turn (with a set for example) but won't on a scary river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Or when I call and a spade hits and he bets again. Or when I call and a spade hits and he checks, thus killing my action. Or when I call and a Jack hits and kills my action.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-25-2005, 01:32 PM
emil3000 emil3000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

I think your line is fine, I really don't think you get more value out of just calling the turn, and you risk losing the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-25-2005, 02:04 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

Yeah, those are basically my sentiments.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-25-2005, 02:35 PM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

The way you played the hand is not bad, I was just giving my side and what I would have done. In games I play, I make money off of hands like 98 and T8 by calling the turn and betting the river. They almost have to check/call the river to snap off a bluff from a busted draw. If I raise the turn, I lose those hands from all but the worst opponents because of the massive strength I've shown raising both the flop and turn.

What it boils down to for me is that villain clearly has a made hand and I clearly have a better made hand. If I raise both the flop and turn, I lose hands that are drawing almost dead to me (T9, T8, 98 for example) and only keep in the sets that have a decent chance to fill and the made straights. Those hands usually will put in a good amount of money on the river anyway so I don't need to put it in on the turn.

Just to make up an example to illustrate this precisely, lets say villain has 98. If I raise flop and turn, he probably folds to the turn raise. If I call the turn and the river is scary, he check/folds (no difference between raising the turn and calling in this case). If the river is a brick, he check/calls in case I'm bluffing a missed draw (which my hand now looks a lot like). If he chooses to put out a blocking bet and fold to a raise on a brick, I still get more money than if I'd raised the turn (the size of his blocking bet).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-25-2005, 06:15 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

Good discussion. Merry Christmas and thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-25-2005, 06:23 PM
Allinlife Allinlife is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Default Re: QJs > Nuts > Action

what discussion? lol.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.