Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2005, 05:56 PM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,307
Default Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

Krishan developed a theory about running good/bad based on the number of straights, flushes and full houses one receives in this thread.

I never quite understood what numbers I was supposed to look at.

Is it this: PokerTracker Misc Stats, in the went to SD column and the W$SD column?

Krishan reckons we get one of each premium (straight, flush, house) in 170 hands, so for my current 34k database I should have taken 200 of each to showdown and won around 80% - is that right?

I only have around 150 of each...

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:04 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

I don't buy it. how you do with these hands is what matters. when I get a hot run of cards, I'll sometimes get a lot of those hands busted and lose a ton of money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:07 PM
J.R. J.R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: More soon
Posts: 1,808
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

or get a bunch of big hands and not have anyone give you action
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:08 PM
MarkD MarkD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 492
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

Or both.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:09 PM
Surfbullet Surfbullet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

I liked Krishan's analysis, but I think there are a number of holes in it in terms of proving one is running good or bad.

The effect of a handful of extra premiums is often drowned out by 5% more or less 1 pair hands winning at showdown - simply because the difference in $ won between premiums + 1 pair hands is not great, but the number of 1 pair hands is enormous compared to premiums.

Everyone plays full houses pretty well. The real money is won and lost in the marginal situations - taking the correct A-highs and bottom pairs to showdown, and knowing when to fold top pair, etc. There is far more to be inferred from the amount + quality of 1 pair hands at showdown than premiums IMHO.

Surf
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:09 PM
Lost Wages Lost Wages is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 981
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

I agree. Also important is what % of the time your draws are being completed. You can be making the "correct" number of flushes but flopping more draws than you should and thus be running bad. Missing solid draws is very expensive.

Lost Wages
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:09 PM
Rudis Rudis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

The most annoying is raising 75s MP getting to SD cheap.
Then getting AA and everyone folds...
Way to go lagging up...=)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:10 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

[ QUOTE ]
or get a bunch of big hands and not have anyone give you action

[/ QUOTE ]

or get the big hands, and lose the big pots when you DO get action
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:55 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

Isn't how AA and KK perform usually a pretty good indicator of how well you've been running?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2005, 07:10 PM
aK13 aK13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: No place like 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,054
Default Re: Question for krishan re: \"running good/bad\" theory

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't how AA and KK perform usually a pretty good indicator of how well you've been running?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ehh...My AKs was 0% W$SD and my AQs was 13% W$SD over my last 5k hands but I was still running extremely well, so I'm fairly sure just looking at AA/KK isn't that strong of an indicator.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.