|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cold-Call 99 in MP3- weak post flop?
[ QUOTE ]
The way this was played is insanely weak. In fact if bet in to on that great flop I would probably raise anyway, and consider a cap. [/ QUOTE ] Against an UTG raiser with no reads, on a ragged flop, you'll cap? I questioned my call PF with no callers in front of me. I don't think he'd 3-bet me out of position with nothing but over cards unless he's a total LAG of which I'd have no idea since I had no reads. I looked over the hand again and realized I probably should have raised this or folded it PF. If this were crypto, I'd definately fold with no reads, but I was at PP and started the table from scratch so the game was very loose passive. 3-betting looks like the way to go. It probably would have given me more info as to his holding since I don't think he's capping the flop with just unsuited high cards. I definately missed a turn bet. There were few safer cards. Thanks for the input, guys. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cold-Call 99 in MP3- weak post flop?
[ QUOTE ]
Against an UTG raiser with no reads... [/ QUOTE ] This has been said many times in many threads, but I will say it again. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] At these levels, with no read, we should be thinking average to weak player until proven differently. |
|
|