Welcome Stranger

FlFishOn · #1 12-05-2005, 12:15 AM

Got an e-mail from Pacific poker, free money in my account. Well, that's the only way I'd ever play there again so...

I play less than 25 hands of limit hold'em and surprise, suprise, I get 3 group 1 hands and AQ. I'd give you more exact numbers but I don't wish to be traced back.

At this point I'm leaning toward the theory that they are juicing the cards for new/returning players. I've had this same feeling before and only one other time did I collect data. It was skewed similarly. I need others to do research since data collection is difficult/slow alone.

PM me if you're interested in collecting a small amount of hand data. You need to be playing from a dormant or new account.

Aytumious · #2 12-05-2005, 12:21 AM

I'm convinced.

TheIrishThug · #3 12-05-2005, 12:24 AM

OMG, I KNOW!! I signed up and got AA twice in less than 10 hands...

wait, i lost those hands. i think i'm confused, how's this supposed to work again?

#4 12-05-2005, 12:58 AM

So goto tables, blitz big limits with your monsters... Don't play for 3 months and repeat?

Newt_Buggs · #5 12-05-2005, 03:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
So goto tables, blitz big limits with your monsters... Don't play for 3 months and repeat?

[/ QUOTE ]
shhh, don't let the secret out!

FlFishOn · #6 12-05-2005, 02:16 PM

"So goto tables, blitz big limits with your monsters... Don't play for 3 months and repeat? "

This is what I'm thinking. Maybe 2 months. Maybe every time they put free money in your empty account.

I went +25 BBs in less than 25 hands.

SoftcoreRevolt · #7 12-05-2005, 02:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
"So goto tables, blitz big limits with your monsters... Don't play for 3 months and repeat? "

This is what I'm thinking. Maybe 2 months. Maybe every time they put free money in your empty account.

I went +25 BBs in less than 25 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

No way that totally happened to me on Party this week! Rock on! We should totally be Online Poker is Rigged bros!

FlFishOn · #8 12-05-2005, 02:19 PM

"I'm convinced. "

I'm not. That's why I'm looking for others to explore this hypothesis.

jman220 · #9 12-05-2005, 02:23 PM

[ QUOTE ]
"I'm convinced. "

I'm not. That's why I'm looking for others to explore this hypothesis.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have a hypothesis. Any number divided by zero is 3. Prove me wrong.

Zetack · #10 12-05-2005, 04:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"I'm convinced. "

I'm not. That's why I'm looking for others to explore this hypothesis.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have a hypothesis. Any number divided by zero is 3. Prove me wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

since you say it will work with any number lets try with fve. Lets try dividing 5 by zero. For five divided by zero to equal three, then it follows that zero times three equals five.

Zero times three actually equals zero. Thus five divided by zero does not equal three. Thus it is not true that any number divided by zero equals three.

--Zetack