#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Multi-tabling TAG sharks more important than you think
Im not saying the logic in itself is flawed, im just pointing out that if people start overexaggerating their arguments, it might as well just be. In that way any conclusion about whatever matter becomes irrelevant and totally out of place with reality.
PS. You savman from NWP? If so, NH!, you guys are hilarious [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Multi-tabling TAG sharks more important than you think
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] sharks play fewer hands so they are actually contributing a smaller % of rake than the fish. [/ QUOTE ] Poker sites don't care who pays what % of the rake. They just care about the overall rake. Multitablers = more tables are in play. More tables in play = more rake for the site. [/ QUOTE ] This is exactly my thoughts. Youll notice right now PokerStars has more tables going than PartyPoker, bet its because there are a lot more multi-tablers there. |
|
|