Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:36 AM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

With 8 people seeing the flop(assuming this is average), you won't limp K7s UTG+1?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:36 AM
Jaran Jaran is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 69
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

Next time you should river the 9 instead of the 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. Geez, dude, you really need this play.

-Jaran
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:37 AM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

Yeah but you're going to lose the hand half the time on the river, right?

When you're up against a turned flush draw and a set?

Lotta cards you don't wanna see come out.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:42 AM
Transference Transference is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntsville, TX
Posts: 103
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

[ QUOTE ]
With 8 people seeing the flop(assuming this is average)

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

bit of a stretch to assume that 8 people are seeing the flop on average isnt it?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:44 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

[ QUOTE ]
With 8 people seeing the flop(assuming this is average), you won't limp K7s UTG+1?

[/ QUOTE ]
Nope. K9s is my minimum, and I feel dirty doing that (K9s is the minimum recommended in SSH, FWIW).

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:46 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

Yo Entity,

I will limp K9s at optimal tables.

In that 88 hand you posted in SS, you really need to call the raise and re-raise.

Brad

On track to getting trashed tonite. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:50 AM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

I'll limp 75 sooted UTG if I know it won't get raised and it will be 10-way.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:50 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

[ QUOTE ]
I'll limp 75 sooted UTG if I know it won't get raised and it will be 10-way.

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't yet understand that the most important aspect of hold'em is position, do you?

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:51 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

[ QUOTE ]
Yo Entity,

I will limp K9s at optimal tables.

In that 88 hand you posted in SS, you really need to call the raise and re-raise.

Brad

On track to getting trashed tonite. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, I swear to god AC Slater is driving me nuts.

Anyway, you see how the hand turned out? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:53 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: WOW QJs Hand

Hack,

I don't mean to be a dick but have you played the .5/1 Party tables?

Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.