My Reason and Phillips Poll

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
What a joke this site and their 600 freaking moderators is becoming.

[/ QUOTE ]

I still have no idea what the user moderators have to do with any of this.

Many of you guys love to lump, but really you are only talking about a couple of mods when you make these kinds of statements. It's unfair to continually lump all the mods together when you only have issues with a few of them.

[istewart]

Cola, what do you mod?

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
Cola, what do you mod?

[/ QUOTE ]

Myself? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Actually, I moderate the mag. and politics forums.

[Exitonly]

Oh come on. Don't back down that easily.

Paul was being a baby, he said he wasn't going to post here again, alright lets hold him to it.

--

I don't know why a guy that's posted here 300 times the past 2 years is creating such a buzz. There are better players/posters that post more often, and don't stir up controversy where there was none.

[PoBoy321]

Meh. Keep him banned, let him back, I think it's all the same, really. He posted what, once every 3 days tops? If it weren't for these threads, I don't think anyone would notice he was gone.

[Smoothcall]

I think he was rude. And u sending him the private message was classy thing to do rather than doing it publicly. And he acted classless making it public. But a ban seems harsh i think. Although it is your site and have the right to do as you choose. Btw Phillips bans people that don't agree with him on his forum so he is getting a taste of his own medicine in a sense.

[Exitonly]

[ QUOTE ]
But there's no way what I read of his can be construed as a personal attack.

[/ QUOTE ]


He said something about Dynasty.. and then when they asked him to apologize for it, he called the owner/operators of the site 'Nazi youth'.

[Michael C.]

The comment he made about Nazi youth was wrong. It was also done AFTER the banning, not before. His comments about Dynasty hardly seemed like a personal attack to me, but were more Paul's oppinions that there were too many bannings, and the fact that the software left up "post deleted by moderator."

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
The comment he made about Nazi youth was wrong. It was also done AFTER the banning, not before.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless I'm missing something, this can't be true. How could he make a post after he was banned? Perhaps you are just using the wrong term.

[Exitonly]

They didnt take place after the banning, he was supposed to apologize, and instead turned it into a hitler comment. If he just told mason that he wasn't going to apologize, i doubt he'd had been banned, and he could go on being his angry/arrogant self.