Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:05 PM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default AA line I\'ve never taken before...

Opponent is very tight, but his preflop raise selection is wide: VP$IP = 16.52 and Preflop raise % = 7.83 over 345 hands

What do you think?

Garland

Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

MP3 ($517.60)
CO ($253.70)
Button ($78.80)
SB ($418.95)
Garland ($482.40)
UTG ($399.90)
UTG+1 ($539.60)
MP1 ($231.90)
MP2 ($460.70)

Preflop: Garland is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">5 folds</font>,<font color="#CC3333">MP3 raises to $14</font>, SB calls, <font color="#CC3333">Garland raises to $52</font>, MP3 calls $52, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>.

Flop: ($118) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Garland checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP3 bets $76</font>, Garland folds.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:09 PM
Wayfare Wayfare is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 46
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

If you had KK/QQ would you still check the flop?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2005, 04:56 AM
Garland Garland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 351
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

[ QUOTE ]
If you had KK/QQ would you still check the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

Against aggressive opponents, certainly. However, a lot of times I bet it myself. I do mix it up...

Garland
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:15 PM
Woolygimp Woolygimp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 80
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

I think you played it well. Some might argue that you should have lead the flop though.
KK and QQ are opponents most likely holdings. Small chance he has AA. AK isn't really an option.
Then again I'm supposedly weak/tight so lets see what everyone else says.

Edit: The more I read this the more it screams KK. I think hes going to have KK over 70% of the time here. That was a big PF raise to call. You both have deep stacks, and you showed real strength PF. He doesn't want to commit his deepstack against that strength. He also sees folding Kings as being too weak, so he calls. Good Fold.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:26 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

[ QUOTE ]
AK isn't really an option.

[/ QUOTE ]

why isn't AK an option? plenty of players play AKo to a re-raise to 50+. and these players will definitely play AKs for 50+. i think you're narrowing down the villain's hand range as a result of that. i lead this flop and slow down after that. or check-call and re-evaluate on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:29 PM
Woolygimp Woolygimp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 80
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
AK isn't really an option.

[/ QUOTE ]

why isn't AK an option? plenty of players play AKo to a re-raise to 50+. and these players will definitely play AKs for 50+. i think you're narrowing down the villain's hand range as a result of that. i lead this flop and slow down after that. or check-call and re-evaluate on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

Check-Calling is horrible. Your only other option is to to lead/fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
AK isn't really an option.

[/ QUOTE ]

why isn't AK an option? plenty of players play AKo to a re-raise to 50+. and these players will definitely play AKs for 50+. i think you're narrowing down the villain's hand range as a result of that. i lead this flop and slow down after that. or check-call and re-evaluate on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

Check-Calling is horrible. Your only other option is to to lead/fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

why is check-calling horrible? care to elaborate? it'll look like a slow play in villain's eyes in my opinion and i doubt he'd bet again on the turn w/ AK. no one can understand your thought process since you type the very minimum.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:38 PM
Woolygimp Woolygimp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 80
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

Anyone fishy enough to call a 50 dollar re raise with AK is going to be fishy enough to fire another barrel on the turn and river. By check/calling you are slowly committing your stack with a possibility of only 2 outs. You aren't gaining any information and aren't giving the villain the chance to show the strength of his hand and let you get away cheaply.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2005, 07:48 AM
meleader2 meleader2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Women are truly -EV
Posts: 320
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
AK isn't really an option.

[/ QUOTE ]

why isn't AK an option? plenty of players play AKo to a re-raise to 50+. and these players will definitely play AKs for 50+. i think you're narrowing down the villain's hand range as a result of that. i lead this flop and slow down after that. or check-call and re-evaluate on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

Check-Calling is horrible. Your only other option is to to lead/fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

yep. lead fold. who else raises you besides kk/qq? i see ak based on this players stats falling into passive mode.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2005, 09:54 AM
Finite_Risk Finite_Risk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 127
Default Re: AA line I\'ve never taken before...

This hand also illustrates the value of position.

If Garland had position in this hand and was checked to on this flop...easy check behind for the same reasons as why he folded in the real hand.

Garland - if instead you were led INTO here, I assume you also fold?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.