Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-08-2003, 05:15 PM
Walter Walter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 42
Default Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

Has anyone written about whether ring games or tournaments have greater expectation for the average player? If not, does anyone have thoughts on this issue

Thanks,
Walter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-08-2003, 05:24 PM
Wake up CALL Wake up CALL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,591
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

I believe by definition an average player has neither a positive nor a negative expectation in either format.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2003, 05:33 PM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

With house take, the average player is a loser.

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2003, 08:54 PM
PuppetMaster PuppetMaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 673
Default Re: Anyone going to answer the question?

He wants to knwo if he can make more playing tournaments or ring games.
From my experience I can make more money playing tournaments. However, I play several $30, $50 tournaments a week, not just SNG
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2003, 05:45 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

The ring games have a greater expectation.

I'm sure Wake up Call and Bozeman thought they were being cute with their answers but they obviously didn't bother to read your question carefully. Even if an average player has a -$1/hr expectation in ring games and -$2/hr expectation in tournaments, his expectation is still greater in the ring game. However, at that point, it's all about which is more fun.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2003, 06:15 PM
Wake up CALL Wake up CALL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,591
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

I'm sure you were trying to be cute Dunasty but you should reread the initial question. Your answer is bogus and speculative like the majority of your advice wheras mine and Bozeman moreso than mine were an accurate answer to the question asked.

You just gotta dislike the high and mighty northerners.


PS: Ask Chris Moneymaker which has a higher expectation.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2003, 07:01 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

I reread the question and stand by my answer. Ring games have a higher expectation for average players even if that expectation is negative. This is mostly true because more money is taken in tournament "rake" than is taken in ring game rake.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-09-2003, 08:45 AM
AceHigh AceHigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,173
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

OTOH, most of the truly bad players I know prefer tournaments. They figure they can get 4-6 hours of playing in for, say $100 in a tournament, vs. losing $100 in 5/10 in a 1/2 hour.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2003, 03:05 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

You might be right. Ring games are definitely more profitable for winning players. But, low buy-in tournaments may be the way to go for average and losing players.

How much does a typical ring game losing player lose per hour?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-08-2003, 08:14 PM
rkiray rkiray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Centennial CO
Posts: 2,029
Default Re: Hourly Rate in Tournaments vs. Ring Games

Sorry,

Your first answer was clearly incorrect. The rake and tips make poker a negative sum game so 0 is clearly an incorrect answer. Also due to the high variance of the game and the skill involved, there are a small number of players that do very well, a few who make some money, but the vast majority are losers. Which also shows your answer is wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.