How are the new games on Party?

[ZeeJustin]

What do you guys think of the Party 15/30, 20/40 and 30/60 games now? I haven't played them since they removed the limit of the number of 30/60 tables, but intuitively it seems like the 15/30 and 30/60 should both be significantly easier now.

How would you compare the new 30/60 to the old 15/30? How about the old 15/30 to the new 15/30?
-TIA
-ZJ

[kurosh]

20/40 is a complete tard-fest. I would compare it to .5/1
30/60 has a lot of good TAGs but there's also a large amount of tards still.

I was at a 60% VPIP 30/60 table last night. My UTG+1 raise got cold-called in 6 spots.

[Klepton]

old 15-30 = new 30-60, cept a little more aggressive

new 15-30 = old 5-10 full

[bicyclekick]

[ QUOTE ]
old 15-30 = new 30-60, cept a little more aggressive

[/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't just say that. Just a lot less bonehead players.

[4thstreetpete]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
old 15-30 = new 30-60, cept a little more aggressive

[/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't just say that. Just a lot less bonehead players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree bicyclekick, the 30/60 game is a lot better than what I remembered of the 15/30 games from a while ago.

[DeezNuts]

[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't just say that. Just a lot less bonehead players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. The old 15-30 game was one of the greatest games you could find online. The 30-60 is still loose, but many less "true" LAGs. Definitely less loose-passives, as they get eaten up pretty quickly.

DN

[fsuplayer]

more posts and threads like these and the games should get worse sooner rather than later.

[goofball]

I always hear from people that the 15/30 and 20/40 are terrible. All the fish have gond to the 30

[geormiet]

I thought the 20/40 was tough.

It depends.

[Ezcheeze]

Just play and find out.