Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2005, 02:59 PM
lgas lgas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 47
Default Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

This hand recently occured at a local MTT that a friend and I played in. It was a $200+RA with I believe 18 players. Payouts were approximately $3150/$1700/$1050/700/350, in case that's relevant.

It was down to the final three. Blinds 1200/2400 with 100 ante. My friend was the chip leader.

Stacks:
Button: ~23,000
Small blind: ~27,000
Big blind (hero): ~60,000

The button was a very good but very aggressive player who had shown that he could push with a wide range of hands.

The SB was the host of the tournament who is a very solid TAG player.

Action:
Button pushes all-in, SB pushes all-in (pretty much instantly), hero looks down and finds QQ... hero says "I shouldn't, but I call".

Afterwards I expressed my surprise that it was a crying call there, and he said he thought it wasn't that clear. I've since come to my own conclusion on the situation, but I was hoping to get some alternate points of view... so... easy call? easy fold? something else?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2005, 03:09 PM
Shilly Shilly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 128
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

I think this is a pretty easy call.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-30-2005, 05:28 PM
TxDozerMan TxDozerMan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

A fold here would be criminal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-30-2005, 05:56 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

It's three handed, call.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-30-2005, 06:06 PM
illegit illegit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

[ QUOTE ]
It's three handed, you have both all-ins covered by more than 2x, and you have the 3rd best hand in HE. Thank a higher power for this situation and call while dancing a jig.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-30-2005, 06:26 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's three handed, you have both all-ins covered by more than 2x, and you have the 3rd best hand in HE. Thank a higher power for this situation and call while dancing a jig.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

I totally never said that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-30-2005, 07:02 PM
locutus2002 locutus2002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 469
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

Hero Folds.

The more I look at this the more of a fold it is on all levels.

I have made some simplifying but reasonable assumptions that in a two player situation the player will win 1st based on the proportion of chips that they have. For example if you have 1/2 the chips then you will win 1st 50% of the time. If you have 1/4 of the chips then you win win 1st 25% of the time and 2nd 75% of the time.

If hero folds he has an EV of 50% X $3150 + 50% X 1700 = $2425

If hero calls he has some % to win the hand. When he wins the hand he will get the $3150; when he loses he will get $3150 1/4 of the time and $1700 3/4 of the time. If you construct a table hero will have to win ~62% of the time to reach the same EV. Hero is unlikely to be 62% in the pot. I have included the table for those who are curious.

At a conceptual level if you are only 50% in the pot then the other 50% of the time you will have a huge chip disadvantage, versus folding and having the same chips.

There is the catasrophic result where both players have the same hand that beats you and a third place outcome becomes possible and much more likely than if you fold and they split the pot.

If you are a better player then your EV of the heads up with even stacks is greater than $2425.

The nature of all in bets signifies at least one premium hand and hero is unlikely to be even 50% in the hand many times. IMO.




% to win hand 3150 1700 EV
35.0% 35.0% 65.0% $1,103 $829 $1,931
37.0% 37.0% 63.0% $1,166 $803 $1,969
39.0% 39.0% 61.0% $1,229 $778 $2,006
41.0% 41.0% 59.0% $1,292 $752 $2,044
43.0% 43.0% 57.0% $1,355 $727 $2,081
45.0% 45.0% 55.0% $1,418 $701 $2,119
47.0% 47.0% 53.0% $1,481 $676 $2,156
49.0% 49.0% 51.0% $1,544 $650 $2,194
51.0% 51.0% 49.0% $1,607 $625 $2,231
53.0% 53.0% 47.0% $1,670 $599 $2,269
55.0% 55.0% 45.0% $1,733 $574 $2,306
57.0% 57.0% 43.0% $1,796 $548 $2,344
59.0% 59.0% 41.0% $1,859 $523 $2,381
61.0% 61.0% 39.0% $1,922 $497 $2,419
63.0% 63.0% 37.0% $1,985 $472 $2,456
65.0% 65.0% 35.0% $2,048 $446 $2,494

0.5 0.5 $1,575 $850 $2,425
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-30-2005, 07:04 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

[ QUOTE ]
Hero Folds.

The more I look at this the more of a fold it is on all levels.

I have made some simplifying but reasonable assumptions that in a two player situation the player will win 1st based on the proportion of chips that they have. For example if you have 1/2 the chips then you will win 1st 50% of the time. If you have 1/4 of the chips then you win win 1st 25% of the time and 2nd 75% of the time.

If hero folds he has an EV of 50% X $3150 + 50% X 1700 = $2425

If hero calls he has some % to win the hand. When he wins the hand he will get the $3150; when he loses he will get $3150 1/4 of the time and $1700 3/4 of the time. If you construct a table hero will have to win ~62% of the time to reach the same EV. Hero is unlikely to be 62% in the pot. I have included the table for those who are curious.

At a conceptual level if you are only 50% in the pot then the other 50% of the time you will have a huge chip disadvantage, versus folding and having the same chips.

There is the catasrophic result where both players have the same hand that beats you and a third place outcome becomes possible and much more likely than if you fold and they split the pot.

If you are a better player then your EV of the heads up with even stacks is greater than $2425.

The nature of all in bets signifies at least one premium hand and hero is unlikely to be even 50% in the hand many times. IMO.




% to win hand 3150 1700 EV
35.0% 35.0% 65.0% $1,103 $829 $1,931
37.0% 37.0% 63.0% $1,166 $803 $1,969
39.0% 39.0% 61.0% $1,229 $778 $2,006
41.0% 41.0% 59.0% $1,292 $752 $2,044
43.0% 43.0% 57.0% $1,355 $727 $2,081
45.0% 45.0% 55.0% $1,418 $701 $2,119
47.0% 47.0% 53.0% $1,481 $676 $2,156
49.0% 49.0% 51.0% $1,544 $650 $2,194
51.0% 51.0% 49.0% $1,607 $625 $2,231
53.0% 53.0% 47.0% $1,670 $599 $2,269
55.0% 55.0% 45.0% $1,733 $574 $2,306
57.0% 57.0% 43.0% $1,796 $548 $2,344
59.0% 59.0% 41.0% $1,859 $523 $2,381
61.0% 61.0% 39.0% $1,922 $497 $2,419
63.0% 63.0% 37.0% $1,985 $472 $2,456
65.0% 65.0% 35.0% $2,048 $446 $2,494

0.5 0.5 $1,575 $850 $2,425

[/ QUOTE ]

Put the two on a range of hands that gives AQ less than a 63%. Keep in mind that the button has a wide range here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-30-2005, 07:08 PM
locutus2002 locutus2002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 469
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

for example one player has aj and the other player has tt.

Hero is only 57% in the hand with QQ.
If they both have underpairs hero is ~60%
If they have an ace and king between them then its much worse.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-30-2005, 07:09 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Over-calling an all-in with three-way action at the final table

[ QUOTE ]
for example one player has aj and the other player has tt.

Hero is only 57% in the hand with QQ.
If they both have underpairs hero is ~60%
If they have an ace and king between them then its much worse.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sorry; I'm on very little sleep and thought 63% was a very low number. Good post.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.