|
|
#12
10-18-2005, 12:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA against a Blind...I mean...BLIND
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This hand is a hypothetical adaptation of a real Commerce 20/40 hand. [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious how the real hand went. [/ QUOTE ] Much less interesting. The blind guy called every bet on every street and was exactly all-in with his river call. He turned over Q6o for rivered bottom pair. 
|
|
#13
10-18-2005, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA against a Blind...I mean...BLIND
[ QUOTE ]
Much less interesting. The blind guy called every bet on every street and was exactly all-in with his river call. He turned over Q6o for rivered bottom pair. [/ QUOTE ] standard commerce hand.
|
|
#14
10-18-2005, 01:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA against a Blind...I mean...BLIND
Personally, i would check the river, People that i know that play blind would ALWAYS look at their hand after I bet, they would muck all the losing hands in this case and raise with all the winning ones, thus making a bet on the end unprofitable.
Considering you have bet and he check-raises still blind, I see no reason to re-raise him, unless you knew he was going to re-raise you back if you did. The variance is big and the cons of losing a lot of money on a hand like this are more than the pros of getting your money in with a 6% edge in this situation. Unless you are very good at not going on tilt, then i guess you should raise again. My point is that he can look at anytime, and then your most recent bet loses allmost all equity, if he sees 23 he will fold, if he raises you HAVE to call, and you will have lost 80 more than you needed to. All the money blind helps, but you are getting money in as a 6% favorite, when he looks he can either cut that off, or beat you out of another 80 as a 90% favorite. It's because of this point that i think you should just call his check-raise
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
