Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-02-2005, 08:51 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

[ QUOTE ]
Or, alternatively, we do 'the Bruiser', that is, 'check-call, check-call, check-fold'

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL

I can see this being the new buzzword
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:00 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

Hi Bruiser,

Lead on the flop. Playing it your way has led you to choosing between giving a free card when you're ahead and playing a big pot when he has you beat or has a nice draw, or wants to test you.

As you played it, check the turn, and if he bets a non-threatening card, raise him big. Betting out on the turn really puts him in charge; he gets to decide if he puts any significant money in the pot, pretty much knowing you have something. If you check-raise, at least his turn bet is made without that information.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:41 AM
coltrane coltrane is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

hey Bruiser,

Gab's not an idiot and he's got position on you and I'm sure he knows your style well....I don't like a stop and go in this situation because it basically puts him "in charge" (like Cero said) and in a spot where he can't make a mistake....you'll be defining your hand pretty well (I think) and he'll basically either fold, raise a better hand, semi-bluff a hand that has a lot of outs, or put you in a tough spot with some other hand.....again, I'm not exactly sure how you play your other hands, but let me ask you, how would you play a small flush?.....I think you should play this hand like that....the other suggestion is, it's 4-handed, why not reraise big preflop and then stick your stack in there?....
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:45 AM
theBruiser500 theBruiser500 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 578
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

HEy cero z that's an interesting idea didn't even occur to me to lead out, your line is appealing, those are the kind of thoughts I was having during the hand. Against a lot of opponents I would lead the turn and fold to a raise but against GoG I think I need to consider calling a raise on the turn if he goes all in. GoG any thoughts here or are they all still secret?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:08 PM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

after reading a couple of the posts, i think checkraising the flop is the absolute worse way to go.

bruiser, would you ever checkcall the flop and lead bet the turn with a monster hand? because checkcalling-betting is a very transparent play to good observent players if you only do it with vurnurable hands.

as it was i would have lead the flop myself and probably lead the turn again after that, being careful not to go broke. or start checkcalling-betting flopped flushes more to protect hands like these.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:40 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

I don't understand the suggestion of leading the flop.

In these heads up matches, the out of position caller checks the flop basically 100% of the time. The preflop raiser is going to bet basically 100%. Why would you voluntarily give up so much information and value by making your default play as leading flop with a hand as good as TPTK?

You can argue that you'll start to lead the flop with a wide range of hands. Once your opponent picks up on this it's not a great default line to be using. The pot has been inflated out of position with 2 additional streets of betting.

This isn't anywhere near as strong a default play as check-call, lead turn or even check raise.

There is also some serious meta game information missing. For example, how well "protected" are your passive lines, such as check-call, check-call, check? Can GoG narrow your hand range down to one of marginal strength with this line?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:44 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

just lead the flop
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:46 PM
fsuplayer fsuplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

[ QUOTE ]
In these heads up matches, the out of position caller checks the flop basically 100% of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

have you actually played HU?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:49 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

Yes.

Assume a heads up match against two good aggressive players, with the SB on the button.

What percent of the time does the action go:

Button raise
BB call
BB check
Button bet

Basically always.

More importantly, what percent of the time has Brusier ever just led out here? 0%? 5%?

You know he's gonna bet. He knows that you know he's gonna bet. Why would you lead with TPTK?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-02-2005, 12:54 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: 50/100 vs. GoG

[ QUOTE ]


You know he's gonna bet. He knows that you know he's gonna bet. Why would you lead with TPTK?

[/ QUOTE ]so you can lead w/ 6high and top set.

i mean, youre serious right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.