Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2005, 01:09 AM
PizzaBoyPetey PizzaBoyPetey is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
Default Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

Assume that I'm new to Poker, and I'm new to card-counting. How will my time be better spent? Devoted to card-counting or poker? Note that I realize that neither is easy to do well. Am I right in assuming card-counting is easier? I also realize that poker is likely more fun in the long run. Also consider the short run: Which will be profitable quicker? Also consider online play as a factor; I don't live in LV but I go there a few times a year.. thanks for your input
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2005, 01:23 AM
Kevin K. Kevin K. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: rooting for the bad guy
Posts: 247
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

Count cards. Build up a big roll. Take it straight to the poker table.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2005, 01:26 AM
Shoe Shoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mil-town
Posts: 98
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

Poker.... and it's not even close.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2005, 02:32 AM
gulebjorn gulebjorn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

Card-counting online is impossible, right? And in B&M they hate card counters and do everything to detect and kick them out, right? Then why would you want to count cards?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2005, 03:01 AM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

blackjack is a difficult field to win at. first you need a huge bankroll. then once you learn how to count you may not even be able to impliment it correctly in a casino. they may just kick you out. however, i do believe that it is much easier to learn how to count profitably then it is to learn how to play poker. the variance is tremendous though, so making money doing it wont be consistent.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2005, 06:13 AM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

[ QUOTE ]
Assume that I'm new to Poker, and I'm new to card-counting. How will my time be better spent? Devoted to card-counting or poker? Note that I realize that neither is easy to do well. Am I right in assuming card-counting is easier? I also realize that poker is likely more fun in the long run. Also consider the short run: Which will be profitable quicker? Also consider online play as a factor; I don't live in LV but I go there a few times a year.. thanks for your input

[/ QUOTE ]

Learn NL poker. Play microlimits. Bonus whore. Gradually move up in stakes.

Blackjack will drive you crazy, the swings are so big.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2005, 06:33 AM
pergesu pergesu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

Absolutely perfect blackjack play will garner something like a .4% edge for the player (I'm sure someone here knows the exact number). You can get mad edge playing poker. So play poker.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2005, 06:35 AM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Hold\'em VS. Blackjack

from what i understand, a skilled counter will earn 1-2% his starting bet per hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.