|
|
|
|
#1
10-19-2005, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth and Math
As I posted in the OTHER thread about this very hand....
The tells that the guy gave off were freaking OBVIOUS (and painful to watch actually). The board was AQTT when the guy (who struck me as the kind of guy who is normally a passive player) bet $10k. Phil is already behind AQ, KJ and any T (as well as QQ and AA). There aren't a whole lot of hands that Phil beats that the guy would make such a large bet with (another AK maybe?? AJ or KK?? not likely). Decent laydown?? Yes. Great laydown?? No. 
|
|
#3
10-20-2005, 12:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hellmuth and Math
[ QUOTE ]
As I posted in the OTHER thread about this very hand.... The tells that the guy gave off were freaking OBVIOUS (and painful to watch actually). The board was AQTT when the guy (who struck me as the kind of guy who is normally a passive player) bet $10k. Phil is already behind AQ, KJ and any T (as well as QQ and AA). There aren't a whole lot of hands that Phil beats that the guy would make such a large bet with (another AK maybe?? AJ or KK?? not likely). Decent laydown?? Yes. Great laydown?? No. [/ QUOTE ] I could lay it down, and im not remotely good - I certainly wouldnt need a read so concrete that the other guy basicly showed me his hand, thats for sure.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
