Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-29-2003, 04:53 PM
ElSapo ElSapo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,415
Default Re: Chaos theory + Seat selection

i do think the distribution does change if you change seats.

Yes, it may change from what it would have been had you not changed seats, but GuyOnTilt nailed it -- it isn't useful b/c you can't predict either way. Just knowing something changed doesn't help if you don't know what it changed from, nor to.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-29-2003, 11:39 PM
Pockets Pockets is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California\'s central valley
Posts: 12
Default Re: Chaos theory + Seat selection

Yes, of course we know that seats #3 & #7 at a 9 player table
are the best seats.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2003, 01:22 PM
SirRaleigh SirRaleigh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 44
Default Re: Chaos theory + Seat selection

>> we all know, some seats are better than others, and they all get their share of cold spells.

I don't agree with this at all. One hand has no useful measureable effect on any other hand, unless a) you are able model in your head the mucking and shuffeling process. So the concept of being 'hot' upto a certain point has no relationship to that seat remaining 'hot'.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2003, 01:49 PM
PAUL-IN PAUL-IN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York/NY
Posts: 127
Default Correct me, please, re: Seat selection

let's say there's a holdem game, 10 handed, playing for 24 hours. if you were to tally each seats winning hands for a session, one seat would be "better" than the other. that "better" seat is simply a statistical deviation from the norm. likewise, that "worse" seat is also a statistical deviation. i did not mean to say that a "hot" seat tends to remain hot.

please correct me: when you deal with many short sessions, resulting in small statistical samplings, the deviations are much larger than if one were to play a 20,000 hour game?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2003, 02:06 PM
SirRaleigh SirRaleigh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 44
Default Re: Correct me, please, re: Seat selection

Yes, the deviations are much larger than if you played in a 20,000 hour game, but who cares because at any given point the information can not be used to predict future results so any talk changing seats or whatever is just silly. I would argue that after 24 hours of limit poker that the results of peoples money have less to do with card irrgularites and more to with player skill and the location of skilled and unskilled people to each other.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-30-2003, 02:16 PM
PAUL-IN PAUL-IN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York/NY
Posts: 127
Default Re: Correct me, please, re: Seat selection

ty, raleigh. i'll come up with more interesting topics when we hold our weekly NLHE home game.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-30-2003, 02:21 PM
SirRaleigh SirRaleigh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 44
Default Re: Correct me, please, re: Seat selection

I will look forward to that.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-30-2003, 09:02 PM
GuyOnTilt GuyOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Chaos theory + Seat selection

[ QUOTE ]
But so will hitting the check or fold button one time half a second slower than you normally do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please elaborate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.