Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2005, 06:55 PM
David Sklansky David Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 241
Default Pure Theory Question

You are playing heads up no limit holdem. No ante. No blinds. Your opponent moves in $1000 in the dark. This is the one and only hand. You will call him with all hands that are favored. Except that he now makes an offer to you. He will expose his cards if you pay him something. You get to look at your cards before you make him an offer.

Hopefully you see that it is worth giving him something with any hand exept AA or 32. My question is what two cards would be in your hand that would pay the most for his exposure.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2005, 07:45 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

great question
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2005, 09:31 PM
Ralphie Ralphie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 14
Default Re: Pure Theory Question-The Average hand (Q7?)

I just saw the question and didn't want to look at 100 posts, so excuse me if someone already said this.

I have heard the average hand is Q7. If this is true I believe this would be the correct answer. What ever the the average strength preflop hand is, I believe will be the answer. Here is my reason:

If your hand is above average you have an easy choice, call every time.

If your hand is below average you have an easy choice, fold every time.

If your hand is exactly average, with no advantage or disadvanage in a race you cannot make a profitable decision without more information. For this reason I believe the hand closed to break even in a race will gain the most from this extra info.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-25-2005, 07:54 PM
jdl22 jdl22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 609
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

Without much thought I'm thinking 98, 87 or 97. The central location makes it so there are a lot of hands that you dominate and that dominate you. Hence the information is quite valuable. It shouldn't be something like AK or 34 because the chance of the information being useful (ie you actually make a different decision based on the information than you would have in the dark) is going to be less with those hands. With these middle of the deck hands it should be higher.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2005, 02:46 PM
WriterBoy WriterBoy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

[ QUOTE ]
Without much thought I'm thinking 98, 87 or 97. The central location makes it so there are a lot of hands that you dominate and that dominate you. Hence the information is quite valuable. It shouldn't be something like AK or 34 because the chance of the information being useful (ie you actually make a different decision based on the information than you would have in the dark) is going to be less with those hands. With these middle of the deck hands it should be higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

i was thinking along similar lines, but i would say JTo.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2005, 08:04 PM
d_rod d_rod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

Could the answer be q7o?

Newbie Reasoning: Q7o is the most marginal hand. If you held AA, it wouldn't be valuable to know what the opponent held. Congruently, if you held 27o it isn't valuable to know either.

If you're smack dab on the fence, it seems to be the most valuable situation to be able to see your opponents cards...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2005, 11:22 PM
OrangeKing OrangeKing is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

[ QUOTE ]
Could the answer be q7o?

Newbie Reasoning: Q7o is the most marginal hand. If you held AA, it wouldn't be valuable to know what the opponent held. Congruently, if you held 27o it isn't valuable to know either.


[/ QUOTE ]

Just to correct a slight error in your newbie reasoning: there would be some small value to know what your opponent had if you had 72o. There are several hands which 72 is favored over, and even a handful it dominates.

Chances are that you've been told that 72o is the worst starting hand in hold 'em, but this is only true in a multiway pot. Heads up, 32o is significantly worse. Granted, this is only important theoretically, but since a lot of people seem to get it wrong, I like to point it out in all these threads. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2005, 08:25 PM
TheShootah TheShootah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: OHIO!
Posts: 28
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

I am gonna take a guess and say whatever the median hand is between Q7 and 23. I think that with Q7, you know your hand is good half the time, so it doesn't make much sense that it's worth that much to see it. It seems like the real hand would be somewhere in the middle of 23 and Q7, but I really have no idea.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-25-2005, 08:34 PM
anduril anduril is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 68
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

A8o
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2005, 08:38 PM
InfernoLL InfernoLL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: Pure Theory Question

A8o is a monster compared to a random hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.