Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2005, 08:24 AM
whiskeytown whiskeytown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 700
Default Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

GWB wanted to bomb Al-Jazeera? - the latest info as charged from an illegal leak (hey, it's the UK - big deal) is that he was all set to bomb their headquarters.

This seems outrageous, but we know that the US military has dropped bombs on Al-Jazeera broadcast points that they had specifically been told about so they WOULDN'T be bombed - and they were hit with SMART BOMBS - which means they were specifically targeted.

Guess that whole freedom of information and the press only applies if you're a Republican, huh? Don't like what you say and they'll blow you away....

I can't wait for the 2006 midterms....I'm amazed the Republicans have any feet left to shoot themselves in.

-------------------------------------------

"Did Bush advocate bombing Al-Jazeera?
We're all familiar with the ways in which the Bush administration has tried to manipulate the press back home, but here's something we hadn't heard before. As the Associated Press is reporting, British authorities have charged a civil servant with violating Britain's Official Secrets Act by leaking a transcript of a conversation between George W. Bush and Tony Blair. The subject of the conversation: Bush's desire to bomb the offices of Al-Jazeera in Qatar.

The AP report relies on a story from London's Daily Mirror. The Daily Mirror, in turn, quotes one unidentified government source as saying that Bush was joking when he talked about bombing the television network during an April 2004 meeting with Blair at the White House. But the paper also quotes another unidentified official who says that "Bush was deadly serious" about bombing Al-Jazeera, "as was Blair" in trying to dissuade him.

What does the White House say about the charge? "We are not going to dignify something so outlandish with a response," a White House official tells the BBC. Which is like a denial, only different.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-23-2005, 10:52 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm amazed the Republicans have any feet left to shoot themselves in.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's not the area I've noticed them shooting. It's usually higher.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2005, 11:27 AM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

[ QUOTE ]
and they were hit with SMART BOMBS - which means they were specifically targeted.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is an incredibly ignorant statement.

[ QUOTE ]
What does the White House say about the charge? "We are not going to dignify something so outlandish with a response," a White House official tells the BBC.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is a perfect response.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2005, 11:40 AM
zipo zipo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 194
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

Well, whiskey, as much as I dislike many aspects/actions/policies of the Bush admin, the fact is that we are at war - and propaganda plays a role.

Given Al Jazeera's role as an anti-American propaganda organ, it is certainly a legitimate military target. However, anything so clumsy as bombing their headquarters in Qatar would certainly negate whatever benefit accrued from eliminating them.

Most likely this report is propaganda from terrorists or other anti-American elements; propaganda which Al Jizz is only too happy to disseminate.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2005, 11:47 AM
Meech Meech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Meechigan
Posts: 59
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

Even though I disagree with Bush a great, great deal of the time (and his cronies, and the moral majority) I don't really have a problem with this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-23-2005, 11:52 AM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Snob Academy getting my PHD.
Posts: 606
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

[ QUOTE ]
Even though I disagree with Bush a great, great deal of the time (and his cronies, and the moral majority) I don't really have a problem with this.

[/ QUOTE ]

So being impartial, Fox news is a legitimate target for Iraqi insurgents?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2005, 12:35 PM
Robbe Robbe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 51
Default Warning over Jazeera bombing report

This is just Fascistinating on so many levels!

Have a nice spin....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2005, 01:28 PM
zipo zipo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 194
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

>> I don't really have a problem with this.<<

Me either. Al Jizz is a mouthpiece for Evil.

Blasting these terrorists out of existence is certainly tempting. The problem is how to do it without creating more of a PR problem than the US already has.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-23-2005, 02:28 PM
Meech Meech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Meechigan
Posts: 59
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

[ QUOTE ]
So being impartial, Fox news is a legitimate target for Iraqi insurgents?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there such a thing as a "legitimate" terrorist target? I dunno.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-23-2005, 06:09 PM
Autocratic Autocratic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D.C.
Posts: 128
Default Re: Freedom of the Press..., unless you disagree with the Prez.

[ QUOTE ]
Well, whiskey, as much as I dislike many aspects/actions/policies of the Bush admin, the fact is that we are at war - and propaganda plays a role.

Given Al Jazeera's role as an anti-American propaganda organ, it is certainly a legitimate military target. However, anything so clumsy as bombing their headquarters in Qatar would certainly negate whatever benefit accrued from eliminating them.

Most likely this report is propaganda from terrorists or other anti-American elements; propaganda which Al Jizz is only too happy to disseminate.

[/ QUOTE ]

As an independent news source, Al Jazeera is certainly NOT a legitimate military target, anymore than Fox News would be (it would rightly be considered terrorism if any American media outlet was bombed).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.